Nickonyms of Classical Writers in Internet Discourse

Names of classical writers are often mentioned in social media as nickonyms, i.e., a digital representation of culturally significant historical figures. This article introduces an onomastic analysis of nickonyms that designate classical writers in polycoded texts of internet communication. The nickonyms collected as part of this neural network experiment were calibrated against the existing multidimensional classifications of internetonyms. The concept of nickname did not prove to coincide with that of pseudonym: for classical writers, the digital name is no sign of authorship as it fulfills other functions. Most of the nickonyms originated from the English transliteration of the basic anthroponym, but the more creative ones were semantically reinterpreted contaminated constructions with a wide range of evaluative identifiers, from neutral to strongly positive ones. While the research refines the existing classification of nickonyms in relation to a narrow corpus of canonical literary figures, it lays foundations for comparative studies of other network anthroponyms. The model classical author – nickonym in a polycoded text could be used to design recognizable names for internet accounts with efficient identification markers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Communication and Social Networks
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2025-4-3-261-268
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nickonyms of Classical Writers in Internet Discourse

Dmitrii Olegovich Bralnin
Virtual Communication and Social Networks
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Nickonyms of Classical Writers in Internet Discourse

Dmitrii Olegovich Bralnin
article en

Abstract

Names of classical writers are often mentioned in social media as nickonyms, i.e., a digital representation of culturally significant historical figures. This article introduces an onomastic analysis of nickonyms that designate classical writers in polycoded texts of internet communication. The nickonyms collected as part of this neural network experiment were calibrated against the existing multidimensional classifications of internetonyms. The concept of nickname did not prove to coincide with that of pseudonym: for classical writers, the digital name is no sign of authorship as it fulfills other functions. Most of the nickonyms originated from the English transliteration of the basic anthroponym, but the more creative ones were semantically reinterpreted contaminated constructions with a wide range of evaluative identifiers, from neutral to strongly positive ones. While the research refines the existing classification of nickonyms in relation to a narrow corpus of canonical literary figures, it lays foundations for comparative studies of other network anthroponyms. The model classical author – nickonym in a polycoded text could be used to design recognizable names for internet accounts with efficient identification markers.

Virtual Communication and Social NetworksVol. 4(3)
Syktyvkar State University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.