A wartime olympics?: geopolitical tensions, international ambition, and IOC’s vision at Paris 2024

Abstract The 2024 Olympic Summer Games in Paris took place amidst the geopolitical crisis in several different places in the world. In particular, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas conflict, and the US-China diplomatic tension showed little sign of amelioration when the Olympic Games commenced in the French capital. This paper will examine the impact that the three contentions had on the organisation and delivery of the 2024 Olympic Summer Games in Paris. More specially, it pays attention to 1) the absence of the Russian and Belarusian Olympic delegations in this competition, 2) the presence of the Israel and Palestine Olympic teams in Paris, and 3) the Sino-American rivalry in the Olympic arena. It also critically assesses the Olympic Games, especially its Olympic Truce initiative, as a way to promote international peace. Due to the geopolitical tensions and diplomatic friction that involves major powers, Paris 2024 revealed several incidents of negative campaigns such as a threat to boycott, blame for politicising international sport, and the accusation of tainted integrity and of having double standards. This situation indicates the limitation of the IOC and the Olympic Games as a platform for promoting international peace when major geopolitical contention overshadows the spirit of the Olympic Truce. Such prevalence of negative campaigns surrounding the global sports mega-event may be a symptom of a wartime Olympics. To some extent, Paris 2024 only disclosed a disrespectful hostility underneath the colourful festivity amongst the nations in conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
French Politics
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-025-00293-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A wartime olympics?: geopolitical tensions, international ambition, and IOC’s vision at Paris 2024

Jung Woo Lee
1 citations
French Politics
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
4.20
article

A wartime olympics?: geopolitical tensions, international ambition, and IOC’s vision at Paris 2024

Jung Woo Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 2024 Olympic Summer Games in Paris took place amidst the geopolitical crisis in several different places in the world. In particular, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas conflict, and the US-China diplomatic tension showed little sign of amelioration when the Olympic Games commenced in the French capital. This paper will examine the impact that the three contentions had on the organisation and delivery of the 2024 Olympic Summer Games in Paris. More specially, it pays attention to 1) the absence of the Russian and Belarusian Olympic delegations in this competition, 2) the presence of the Israel and Palestine Olympic teams in Paris, and 3) the Sino-American rivalry in the Olympic arena. It also critically assesses the Olympic Games, especially its Olympic Truce initiative, as a way to promote international peace. Due to the geopolitical tensions and diplomatic friction that involves major powers, Paris 2024 revealed several incidents of negative campaigns such as a threat to boycott, blame for politicising international sport, and the accusation of tainted integrity and of having double standards. This situation indicates the limitation of the IOC and the Olympic Games as a platform for promoting international peace when major geopolitical contention overshadows the spirit of the Olympic Truce. Such prevalence of negative campaigns surrounding the global sports mega-event may be a symptom of a wartime Olympics. To some extent, Paris 2024 only disclosed a disrespectful hostility underneath the colourful festivity amongst the nations in conflict.

French PoliticsVol. 23(3)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.