From Euro-Atlantic to the Indo-Pacific: Assessing NATO’s Evolving Policy on China

NATO’s stance on China has gradually shifted over the years, recognising it as both a destabilising force and a systemic challenge. This change is largely driven by the intensifying competition between the United States (U.S.) and China in the Indo-Pacific region. However, the differing rates at which the U.S. and European members of NATO have adjusted their positions reflect more about their evolving perspectives than any significant change in China’s actions. While NATO’s focus will likely remain Euro-centric, European members are increasingly pressured to address the implications of Chinese actions due to perceived links between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific security (especially after No-limits friendship between Russia and China). This paper sheds light on the factors that have contributed to making China a systemic rival of NATO. It also seeks to identify the internal and external challenges that have hampered the development of a unified NATO strategy on China. The paper highlights that in order to manage these complexities, NATO may need to enhance its political role and invest in risk reduction measures to prevent inadvertent escalation in case of a conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Studies
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.045.01.00412
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Euro-Atlantic to the Indo-Pacific: Assessing NATO’s Evolving Policy on China

Sitara Noor
Strategic Studies
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

From Euro-Atlantic to the Indo-Pacific: Assessing NATO’s Evolving Policy on China

Sitara Noor
article en

Abstract

NATO’s stance on China has gradually shifted over the years, recognising it as both a destabilising force and a systemic challenge. This change is largely driven by the intensifying competition between the United States (U.S.) and China in the Indo-Pacific region. However, the differing rates at which the U.S. and European members of NATO have adjusted their positions reflect more about their evolving perspectives than any significant change in China’s actions. While NATO’s focus will likely remain Euro-centric, European members are increasingly pressured to address the implications of Chinese actions due to perceived links between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific security (especially after No-limits friendship between Russia and China). This paper sheds light on the factors that have contributed to making China a systemic rival of NATO. It also seeks to identify the internal and external challenges that have hampered the development of a unified NATO strategy on China. The paper highlights that in order to manage these complexities, NATO may need to enhance its political role and invest in risk reduction measures to prevent inadvertent escalation in case of a conflict.

Strategic StudiesVol. 45(1)
Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.