A First-Principles Screening for Axial Ligand Regulation of Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction on Dual-Metal Atomic Catalysts (M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub>N<sub>6</sub>-R)

A primary challenge in the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR) is the rational design and engineering of high-efficiency electrocatalysts. A series of M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub>N<sub>6</sub> catalysts (M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub> = NiNi, CoNi, CoFe, CoCo) with precisely tailored axial ligands (R = -OH, -COH, -CN) have been high-throughput screened out to exhibit optimal electrocatalytic activity, which is extended to further estimate their CO<sub>2</sub>RR performance in this work. The adsorption energies of three distinct ligands at the M<sub>1</sub>-M<sub>2</sub> bridge site are evaluated to quantitatively assess the ligand stabilization. On pristine and ligand-engineered M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub>N<sub>6</sub> catalysts, the free energy variation along CO<sub>2</sub>RR pathways leading to C1 products reveals that the initial proton-coupled electron transfer to form the *HCOO/*COOH intermediate is the main potential-limiting step of yielding the key intermediate CO*. The formation barrier energy difference of <0.06 eV between *HCOO and *COOH intermediates on pristine CoCo/CoFe/CoNi and CN-functionalized CoFe/CoCo catalysts facilitates *CO intermediate generation and enables the subsequent *CO-*CO coupling to C2 products for formation of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OH and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>. However, -COH and -OH modification excludes *CO-intermediate formation and directs the reaction toward CH<sub>4</sub> and CH<sub>3</sub>OH production due to the large kinetic energy difference of 0.96-1.11 eV between *HCOO and *COOH. Our results provide a possible axial ligand engineering strategy of regulating C1/C2 product selectivity on different dual-atom catalysts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c05014
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A First-Principles Screening for Axial Ligand Regulation of Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction on Dual-Metal Atomic Catalysts (M1M2N6-R)

Yousong Gu, Jiangnan Shen, Hualin Chen, Qiuju Zhang et al.
ACS Omega
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

A First-Principles Screening for Axial Ligand Regulation of Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction on Dual-Metal Atomic Catalysts (M1M2N6-R)

Yousong Gu, Jiangnan Shen, Hualin Chen, Qiuju Zhang, Liang Chen
article en

Abstract

A primary challenge in the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR) is the rational design and engineering of high-efficiency electrocatalysts. A series of M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub>N<sub>6</sub> catalysts (M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub> = NiNi, CoNi, CoFe, CoCo) with precisely tailored axial ligands (R = -OH, -COH, -CN) have been high-throughput screened out to exhibit optimal electrocatalytic activity, which is extended to further estimate their CO<sub>2</sub>RR performance in this work. The adsorption energies of three distinct ligands at the M<sub>1</sub>-M<sub>2</sub> bridge site are evaluated to quantitatively assess the ligand stabilization. On pristine and ligand-engineered M<sub>1</sub>M<sub>2</sub>N<sub>6</sub> catalysts, the free energy variation along CO<sub>2</sub>RR pathways leading to C1 products reveals that the initial proton-coupled electron transfer to form the *HCOO/*COOH intermediate is the main potential-limiting step of yielding the key intermediate CO*. The formation barrier energy difference of <0.06 eV between *HCOO and *COOH intermediates on pristine CoCo/CoFe/CoNi and CN-functionalized CoFe/CoCo catalysts facilitates *CO intermediate generation and enables the subsequent *CO-*CO coupling to C2 products for formation of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OH and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>. However, -COH and -OH modification excludes *CO-intermediate formation and directs the reaction toward CH<sub>4</sub> and CH<sub>3</sub>OH production due to the large kinetic energy difference of 0.96-1.11 eV between *HCOO and *COOH. Our results provide a possible axial ligand engineering strategy of regulating C1/C2 product selectivity on different dual-atom catalysts.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(33)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), IRD Fuel Cells (Denmark) (DK), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Ningbo Institute of Industrial Technology (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.