Retrospective evaluation of patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan verification data in a single department

Objective: This study aims to retrospectively analyze and evaluate patient-specific quality assurance (QA) data from radiotherapy plans using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques at Akdeniz University Department of Radiation Oncology between 2017 and 2023. Methods: QA data from 1574 treatment plans for 1078 patients were reviewed. Treatment plans were generated using PRECISE TPS for static IMRT and MONACO TPS for dynamic IMRT/VMAT techniques. Gamma index analysis was performed using MatriXX with a 3%/3 mm acceptance criterion. Data was categorized based on disease location, treatment devices, and planning systems, then statistically analyzed using Google Sheets and Looker Studio. Results: Throughout this survey, no QA data was available for the year 2021 due to equipment upgrades. The anatomical distribution of plans was head-neck (496), pelvis (492), thoracic (542), abdomen (31), vertebra (10), femur (2). Most frequently applied techniques included 9-field IMRT (31.9%), dual-arc VMAT (23.3%), and single-arc VMAT (19.4%). Mean ± SD Gamma pass rates were 97.29% ± 1.60 for IMRT (356 plans) and 99.13% ± 1.10 for VMAT (1012 plans). Conclusion: Both treatment planning systems (TPSs) yielded high gamma pass rates, indicating a high level of treatment delivery accuracy and reliability. VMAT usage increased over time due to its compatibility with equipment and precise dose delivery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15406/ijrrt.2025.12.00422
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective evaluation of patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan verification data in a single department

L. Şahin, Nina Tunçel
International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Retrospective evaluation of patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan verification data in a single department

L. Şahin, Nina Tunçel
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to retrospectively analyze and evaluate patient-specific quality assurance (QA) data from radiotherapy plans using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques at Akdeniz University Department of Radiation Oncology between 2017 and 2023. Methods: QA data from 1574 treatment plans for 1078 patients were reviewed. Treatment plans were generated using PRECISE TPS for static IMRT and MONACO TPS for dynamic IMRT/VMAT techniques. Gamma index analysis was performed using MatriXX with a 3%/3 mm acceptance criterion. Data was categorized based on disease location, treatment devices, and planning systems, then statistically analyzed using Google Sheets and Looker Studio. Results: Throughout this survey, no QA data was available for the year 2021 due to equipment upgrades. The anatomical distribution of plans was head-neck (496), pelvis (492), thoracic (542), abdomen (31), vertebra (10), femur (2). Most frequently applied techniques included 9-field IMRT (31.9%), dual-arc VMAT (23.3%), and single-arc VMAT (19.4%). Mean ± SD Gamma pass rates were 97.29% ± 1.60 for IMRT (356 plans) and 99.13% ± 1.10 for VMAT (1012 plans). Conclusion: Both treatment planning systems (TPSs) yielded high gamma pass rates, indicating a high level of treatment delivery accuracy and reliability. VMAT usage increased over time due to its compatibility with equipment and precise dose delivery.

International Journal of Radiology & Radiation TherapyVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.