Terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity»: relevant questions of interpretation and application practice

The article provides a systematic analysis of the terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity», which are used in the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is noted that the both concepts, despite their wide regulatory application, remain legislatively undefined, which creates risks of ambiguous their interpretation and complicates practice of their application. It is proved that the term «criminally unlawful» is broader in meaning than «criminal», as it covers both crimes and misdemeanors. At the same time, the analysis of the legislation brings to the conclusion on terminological inconsistency in their use. It has been established that the terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity» function as cross-cutting legal categories. The application of these terms varies depending whether it is a separate individual, an organized group or a criminal organization. Analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 27, 28, 43, 66, 255-1, etc.) made it possible to identify the characteristic features of these terms, in particular: intentional nature; coverage of one or more completed or incomplete torts; the possibility of their commission both by action or inaction; determination or undetermination of the object of the encroachment. Special attention is given to the analysis of judicial practice related to the application of Art. 255-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine on criminal influence. In this Article, the term «criminal activity» is considered as an object of the criminal influence. Different approaches of courts to the issue of prejudicial nature and identification of the subject’s intention on criminal activity are revealed. It is argued that the current wording of Article 255-1 allows for a certain deviation from the general principle of subjective attitude to guilt. However, the inquiring of specific actions that form the content of criminal influence remains a mandatory condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.3.29
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity»: relevant questions of interpretation and application practice

Andrii Vozniuk, Артем Нікітін
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
article

Terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity»: relevant questions of interpretation and application practice

Andrii Vozniuk, Артем Нікітін
article en

Abstract

The article provides a systematic analysis of the terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity», which are used in the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is noted that the both concepts, despite their wide regulatory application, remain legislatively undefined, which creates risks of ambiguous their interpretation and complicates practice of their application. It is proved that the term «criminally unlawful» is broader in meaning than «criminal», as it covers both crimes and misdemeanors. At the same time, the analysis of the legislation brings to the conclusion on terminological inconsistency in their use. It has been established that the terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity» function as cross-cutting legal categories. The application of these terms varies depending whether it is a separate individual, an organized group or a criminal organization. Analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 27, 28, 43, 66, 255-1, etc.) made it possible to identify the characteristic features of these terms, in particular: intentional nature; coverage of one or more completed or incomplete torts; the possibility of their commission both by action or inaction; determination or undetermination of the object of the encroachment. Special attention is given to the analysis of judicial practice related to the application of Art. 255-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine on criminal influence. In this Article, the term «criminal activity» is considered as an object of the criminal influence. Different approaches of courts to the issue of prejudicial nature and identification of the subject’s intention on criminal activity are revealed. It is argued that the current wording of Article 255-1 allows for a certain deviation from the general principle of subjective attitude to guilt. However, the inquiring of specific actions that form the content of criminal influence remains a mandatory condition.

Uzhhorod National University Herald Series LawVol. 3(89)
Max Planck Society (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Terms «criminally unlawful activity» and «criminal activity»: relevant questions of interpretation and application practice — Andrii Vozniuk, Артем Нікітін · Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS