We’re not heroes, we’re just doing our job: analysis of social workers’ discourses about their profession in online communities

Abstract The focus of the paper is how social professionals perceive their profession and its external judgment or recognition in the times of COVID-19. We analyse social workers’ comments in online professional communities on social media platforms. The web-based content analysis covered a 3 year period including the pandemic, and it is based on 6 692 online comments. According to our results, the entire comment stream is characterized by a mixed tone with a strong critical edge. The content analysis showed that Hirshman’s theory provides a productive analytic framework to observe loyalty and voice and frame different levels of dissatisfaction and corrective mechanisms. Thus, we found four overarching phases and attitudes with moderate, strengthening, strong, and fading voice. Different intensities of loyalty and voice mirrored different stages and waves of the epidemic. Though the results of the content analysis resonate with previous research findings based on more conventional methods in many ways, they added further depth to domestic and international knowledge. While social workers’ perception of their situation and prestige of social work was overwhelmingly negative, a method of coping with their burdens was through professional pride, solidarity, cohesion, self-compensation and compassion for clientele.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02251-2
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We’re not heroes, we’re just doing our job: analysis of social workers’ discourses about their profession in online communities

Zsófia Bauer, Ágnes Győri, Éva Perpék, Zsuzsanna Réka Elek
Quality & Quantity
Social Work Education and Practice
article

We’re not heroes, we’re just doing our job: analysis of social workers’ discourses about their profession in online communities

Zsófia Bauer, Ágnes Győri, Éva Perpék, Zsuzsanna Réka Elek
article en

Abstract

Abstract The focus of the paper is how social professionals perceive their profession and its external judgment or recognition in the times of COVID-19. We analyse social workers’ comments in online professional communities on social media platforms. The web-based content analysis covered a 3 year period including the pandemic, and it is based on 6 692 online comments. According to our results, the entire comment stream is characterized by a mixed tone with a strong critical edge. The content analysis showed that Hirshman’s theory provides a productive analytic framework to observe loyalty and voice and frame different levels of dissatisfaction and corrective mechanisms. Thus, we found four overarching phases and attitudes with moderate, strengthening, strong, and fading voice. Different intensities of loyalty and voice mirrored different stages and waves of the epidemic. Though the results of the content analysis resonate with previous research findings based on more conventional methods in many ways, they added further depth to domestic and international knowledge. While social workers’ perception of their situation and prestige of social work was overwhelmingly negative, a method of coping with their burdens was through professional pride, solidarity, cohesion, self-compensation and compassion for clientele.

Quality & QuantityVol. 60(1)
Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU), Institute for Sociology (HU), Centre for Social Sciences (HU)
Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.