Gender Pay Gap and Cultural Values

Abstract Employing a cross-country sample, we examine how a population’s underlying cultural values help explain gender compensation variation across corporate executives. The results show that the cultural differences, embedded in societies long before the board’s compensation decisions, have significant explanatory power for the observed gender gap in executive compensation. Using an Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition combined with variables previously shown to be fundamental determinants of executive compensation, we find that adding cultural measures increases the model’s explanatory power of the gender compensation gap from 44% to 95%. We use further identification strategies to support causal inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109025000183
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Pay Gap and Cultural Values

Kristina Minnick, Jeffry M. Netter, Natasha Burns, Laura T. Starks
2 citations
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
article

Gender Pay Gap and Cultural Values

Kristina Minnick, Jeffry M. Netter, Natasha Burns, Laura T. Starks
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Employing a cross-country sample, we examine how a population’s underlying cultural values help explain gender compensation variation across corporate executives. The results show that the cultural differences, embedded in societies long before the board’s compensation decisions, have significant explanatory power for the observed gender gap in executive compensation. Using an Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition combined with variables previously shown to be fundamental determinants of executive compensation, we find that adding cultural measures increases the model’s explanatory power of the gender compensation gap from 44% to 95%. We use further identification strategies to support causal inference.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisVol. 61(1)
Bentley University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.