Francisco de Vitoria’s ius in bello

Francisco de Vitoria (1483/1486 – 1546), a Spanish Dominican friar and the dean of the School of Salamanca, developed a comprehensive theory of just war. In this theory, he addressed ius ad bellum, ius in bello, and ius post bellum. His interpretations of ius in bello – the rules for waging a just war by a just side against an unjust side – are particularly useful, even to this day. This paper briefly analyzes these rules and the solid, yet heterogeneous arguments Vitoria used to prove their validity and correctness. Vitoria’s ius in bello corresponds to his understanding of a just war as the judgment of an unjust side by a just side for harm caused. Thus, it primarily regulates the conduct of the just side in an ongoing just war, giving it superiority over the unjust side. Conversely, it restricts the just side’s use of military force against the unjust side, a concept that is a precursor to the modern law of war.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Societas et iurisprudentia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2025/13/2/19-46
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Francisco de Vitoria’s ius in bello

Peter Vyšný
Societas et iurisprudentia
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

Francisco de Vitoria’s ius in bello

Peter Vyšný
article en

Abstract

Francisco de Vitoria (1483/1486 – 1546), a Spanish Dominican friar and the dean of the School of Salamanca, developed a comprehensive theory of just war. In this theory, he addressed ius ad bellum, ius in bello, and ius post bellum. His interpretations of ius in bello – the rules for waging a just war by a just side against an unjust side – are particularly useful, even to this day. This paper briefly analyzes these rules and the solid, yet heterogeneous arguments Vitoria used to prove their validity and correctness. Vitoria’s ius in bello corresponds to his understanding of a just war as the judgment of an unjust side by a just side for harm caused. Thus, it primarily regulates the conduct of the just side in an ongoing just war, giving it superiority over the unjust side. Conversely, it restricts the just side’s use of military force against the unjust side, a concept that is a precursor to the modern law of war.

Societas et iurisprudentiaVol. 13(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Francisco de Vitoria’s ius in bello — Peter Vyšný · Societas et iurisprudentia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS