Comparison of calculation times of FOPID and PID controllers along with control quality for Two Rotor Aerodynamical System

Two rotor aerodynamical system can be compared to a tethered helicopter. This is one of the systems in which the problem of cross-coupling occurs, which complicates the implementation of control. Therefore, in the case of TRAS system, four controllers are most often used. PID and FOPID controllers were used in different configurations in order to compare them. First, coefficients were selected using the Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm. Then, based on simulation, a preliminary comparison of the controllers was made. In the next part, measurements were carried out on the real device. Based on the cost function, it was noticed that FOPID controllers achieve better results. In the case of FOPIDs, there may be concerns related to the calculation time. This is a valid question related to the possible application of this type of control for devices requiring control determination in real time. Therefore, the calculation times of the individual controllers were also measured and compared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/bpasts.2025.155889
Primary Topic
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of calculation times of FOPID and PID controllers along with control quality for Two Rotor Aerodynamical System

Jakub Żegleń-Włodarczyk
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
article

Comparison of calculation times of FOPID and PID controllers along with control quality for Two Rotor Aerodynamical System

Jakub Żegleń-Włodarczyk
article en

Abstract

Two rotor aerodynamical system can be compared to a tethered helicopter. This is one of the systems in which the problem of cross-coupling occurs, which complicates the implementation of control. Therefore, in the case of TRAS system, four controllers are most often used. PID and FOPID controllers were used in different configurations in order to compare them. First, coefficients were selected using the Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm. Then, based on simulation, a preliminary comparison of the controllers was made. In the next part, measurements were carried out on the real device. Based on the cost function, it was noticed that FOPID controllers achieve better results. In the case of FOPIDs, there may be concerns related to the calculation time. This is a valid question related to the possible application of this type of control for devices requiring control determination in real time. Therefore, the calculation times of the individual controllers were also measured and compared.

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences
Jagiellonian University (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.