ESG readiness in the context of climate risk management approaches: a comparative study of corporate strategies

The article discusses the specifics of incorporating climate risks into corporate governance systems, using companies in the marine fishing and fish farming sector as examples. The relevance of the study is due to the need for businesses to adapt to increasing climate threats and regulatory requirements in the field of sustainable development. The method used is a qualitative comparative analysis of three companies demonstrating different levels of maturity in their management approaches. Three models have been identified: full integration of climate factors into strategic management, technological adaptation without institutional formalisation, and initial institutionalisation with limited disclosure of information. It was found that only with specialised management structures, climate indicators and transparent reporting do companies demonstrate high adaptability to climate risks. At the same time, companies without a sustainable management architecture are limited in their ability to respond strategically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Management
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2500-1469-2025-13-6-473-487
Primary Topic
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG readiness in the context of climate risk management approaches: a comparative study of corporate strategies

Arina A. Bobkova
Russian Journal of Management
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
article

ESG readiness in the context of climate risk management approaches: a comparative study of corporate strategies

Arina A. Bobkova
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the specifics of incorporating climate risks into corporate governance systems, using companies in the marine fishing and fish farming sector as examples. The relevance of the study is due to the need for businesses to adapt to increasing climate threats and regulatory requirements in the field of sustainable development. The method used is a qualitative comparative analysis of three companies demonstrating different levels of maturity in their management approaches. Three models have been identified: full integration of climate factors into strategic management, technological adaptation without institutional formalisation, and initial institutionalisation with limited disclosure of information. It was found that only with specialised management structures, climate indicators and transparent reporting do companies demonstrate high adaptability to climate risks. At the same time, companies without a sustainable management architecture are limited in their ability to respond strategically.

Russian Journal of ManagementVol. 13(6)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.