Villages, protocols, and the AI-driven future of work: some Wittgensteinian reflections

How will the future of work organizations be affected by the spread of generative AI? Based on Wittgensteinian reflections on the nature of rules and rule-following, this paper argues that so far, in many jobs the interpretation of rules had to lie with those doing the actual work. In the future, it might become more and more embodied in AI systems that advise, monitor, and sanction workers. This shifts power to employers and reduces the necessity of even bringing workers together in organizations. The ongoing trend of ‘fissuring’ organizations, e.g. through outsourcing, is likely to be reinforced. A possible scenario is a polarization of work organization into, on the one hand, what I call ‘villages’–in which the members of the community retain the right to interpret, or even write, their workplace rules –, and, on the other hand, ‘protocolled jobs’–in which workers lose this right and become lonely puppets of rules-with-algorithms with minimal interpretive space. The paper concludes with some reflections on possible societal implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2546231
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Villages, protocols, and the AI-driven future of work: some Wittgensteinian reflections

Lisa Herzog
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Villages, protocols, and the AI-driven future of work: some Wittgensteinian reflections

Lisa Herzog
article en

Abstract

How will the future of work organizations be affected by the spread of generative AI? Based on Wittgensteinian reflections on the nature of rules and rule-following, this paper argues that so far, in many jobs the interpretation of rules had to lie with those doing the actual work. In the future, it might become more and more embodied in AI systems that advise, monitor, and sanction workers. This shifts power to employers and reduces the necessity of even bringing workers together in organizations. The ongoing trend of ‘fissuring’ organizations, e.g. through outsourcing, is likely to be reinforced. A possible scenario is a polarization of work organization into, on the one hand, what I call ‘villages’–in which the members of the community retain the right to interpret, or even write, their workplace rules –, and, on the other hand, ‘protocolled jobs’–in which workers lose this right and become lonely puppets of rules-with-algorithms with minimal interpretive space. The paper concludes with some reflections on possible societal implications.

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
University of Groningen (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.