Validation of the autonomous learning strategies scale in Peruvian university students: evaluation of factorial models

Autonomous learning is a fundamental competence in higher education, empowering students to take control of their academic development. Assessing this skill reliably requires robust measurement tools. This study aimed to evaluate the factorial structure and internal consistency of the Autonomous Learning Strategies Scale (CETA) among university students in Peru. We included 418 college students from professional education programs in Peru who participated in the study. The CETA, designed to assess multiple dimensions of autonomous learning, was subjected to rigorous psychometric evaluation. First-order, second-order, and bifactor models were tested through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega coefficients. The second-order factor model with six underlying dimensions demonstrated the best fit indices and model stability. Inter-factor correlations were moderate and conceptually coherent with the scale’s theoretical structure. The findings support the second-order model as the most reliable and valid representation of the CETA. This model is recommended for future research and practical applications in educational settings aimed at evaluating and fostering autonomous learning in university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1574155
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the autonomous learning strategies scale in Peruvian university students: evaluation of factorial models

Janina Bazalar-Palacios, Miguel Ipanaqué-Zapata, Joel Figueroa-Quiñones, Magaly M. Quiñones-Negrete et al.
Frontiers in Education
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Validation of the autonomous learning strategies scale in Peruvian university students: evaluation of factorial models

Janina Bazalar-Palacios, Miguel Ipanaqué-Zapata, Joel Figueroa-Quiñones, Magaly M. Quiñones-Negrete, Oriana Rivera‐Lozada, Nilo Albert Velásquez-Castillo, Hessel Valle-Sandoval, Paolo Cayetano-Terrel, Alberto Cerna-Salcedo
article en

Abstract

Autonomous learning is a fundamental competence in higher education, empowering students to take control of their academic development. Assessing this skill reliably requires robust measurement tools. This study aimed to evaluate the factorial structure and internal consistency of the Autonomous Learning Strategies Scale (CETA) among university students in Peru. We included 418 college students from professional education programs in Peru who participated in the study. The CETA, designed to assess multiple dimensions of autonomous learning, was subjected to rigorous psychometric evaluation. First-order, second-order, and bifactor models were tested through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega coefficients. The second-order factor model with six underlying dimensions demonstrated the best fit indices and model stability. Inter-factor correlations were moderate and conceptually coherent with the scale’s theoretical structure. The findings support the second-order model as the most reliable and valid representation of the CETA. This model is recommended for future research and practical applications in educational settings aimed at evaluating and fostering autonomous learning in university students.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Universidad Alas Peruanas (PE), Catholic University of Trujillo (PE), Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE), Catholic University Los Angeles of Chimbote (PE), Universidad Señor de Sipán (PE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.