The bright side of sharing mistakes: a systematic literature review for future research direction

This study systematically analyses the research landscape on sharing mistakes as a critical component of knowledge sharing. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), we analysed 47 relevant studies from Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify key themes, theoretical foundations, and research gaps. The findings reveal that most studies focus on individual-level factors, primarily employing survey methods and strongly emphasising European research contexts. Theoretical perspectives frequently referenced include social exchange theory, knowledge management theory, organisational learning theory, and attribution theory. A key contribution of this study is the application of the AMO framework (antecedents, mediators / moderators, and outcomes) to systematically classify the factors influencing sharing mistakes behaviours. This approach provides a structured understanding of the drivers, mechanisms, and consequences of sharing mistakes, offering a novel perspective for future research and practical applications. By addressing critical research gaps, this study underscores the importance of sharing mistakes in fostering organisational learning, innovation, and performance improvement while outlining areas for further exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2025.147952
Primary Topic
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The bright side of sharing mistakes: a systematic literature review for future research direction

Reni Rosari, Tur Nastiti, Pratiwi Dwi Suhartanti
1 links
International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
article

The bright side of sharing mistakes: a systematic literature review for future research direction

Reni Rosari, Tur Nastiti, Pratiwi Dwi Suhartanti
article en

Abstract

This study systematically analyses the research landscape on sharing mistakes as a critical component of knowledge sharing. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), we analysed 47 relevant studies from Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify key themes, theoretical foundations, and research gaps. The findings reveal that most studies focus on individual-level factors, primarily employing survey methods and strongly emphasising European research contexts. Theoretical perspectives frequently referenced include social exchange theory, knowledge management theory, organisational learning theory, and attribution theory. A key contribution of this study is the application of the AMO framework (antecedents, mediators / moderators, and outcomes) to systematically classify the factors influencing sharing mistakes behaviours. This approach provides a structured understanding of the drivers, mechanisms, and consequences of sharing mistakes, offering a novel perspective for future research and practical applications. By addressing critical research gaps, this study underscores the importance of sharing mistakes in fostering organisational learning, innovation, and performance improvement while outlining areas for further exploration.

International Journal of Knowledge Management StudiesVol. 16(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Institut Teknologi Kalimantan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.