Characterising metal slag-based geopolymer concrete for radiation shielding application

The use of geopolymer-based concrete has become a viable alternative for mitigating of the ecological and socioeconomical issues related to the production and utilisation of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in radiation shielding concrete. However, geopolymer preparation can be achieved through different alumina-silicate precursors whose chemical composition are not the same, hence, shielding competence of the geopolymer-based concrete could vary widely. This study was aimed at evaluating the gamma photon shielding competence of blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete. Geopolymer concrete was prepared using aggregates and geopolymer gel. The geopolymer was prepared using metal slag as precursor and a solution of NaOH and Na2SiO3 as the alkali activator. The prepared concrete was prepared and oven and ambient air for 7, 14-, 21-, and 28-day periods. The cured concrete was then subjected to density measurement, compressive strength (CS) test, chemical composition analysis, and shielding characterisation. The density and CS increased from 2.56 g/cm<sup>3</sup> to 2.79 g/cm<sup>3 </sup>and 21.34 MPa to 39.67 MPa for OPC-based control concrete (OPC-CC), respectively, while the corresponding ranges for geopolymer-based concrete (GP_CC) were 2.81 g/cm3 –3.87 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and 23.32 MPa –43.52 MPa as the curing period increased. OPC-CC had higher CaO content, while the silicate content of GP_CC was relatively higher. For OPC_CC the mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) decreased from maximum values of 17.2368 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 38.145 cm<sup>-1</sup> to 0.0232 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 0.0513 cm<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. On the other hand, the range of MACs and LACs for GP-CC are 0.0225 cm<sup>2</sup>/g – 14.5582 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 0.0546 cm<sup>-1</sup>– 35.2455 cm<sup>-1</sup>. The fast neutron removal cross-section of GP_CC was higher than that of OPC_CC. The gamma photon and fast neutron interacting abilities of GP_CC was better than that of OPC_CC for gamma energies above 0.40 MeV. The shielding ability of GP_CC was comparable to some traditional shielding materials. The GP_CC can be used for radiation shielding concrete in radiation facilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Confluence Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5455/cujostech.250409
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterising metal slag-based geopolymer concrete for radiation shielding application

I.O. Olarinoye, Shpetim Salihu, M.T. Kolo, Ibrahim Fawole
1 citations
Confluence Journal of Science and Technology
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
0.52
article

Characterising metal slag-based geopolymer concrete for radiation shielding application

I.O. Olarinoye, Shpetim Salihu, M.T. Kolo, Ibrahim Fawole
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of geopolymer-based concrete has become a viable alternative for mitigating of the ecological and socioeconomical issues related to the production and utilisation of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in radiation shielding concrete. However, geopolymer preparation can be achieved through different alumina-silicate precursors whose chemical composition are not the same, hence, shielding competence of the geopolymer-based concrete could vary widely. This study was aimed at evaluating the gamma photon shielding competence of blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete. Geopolymer concrete was prepared using aggregates and geopolymer gel. The geopolymer was prepared using metal slag as precursor and a solution of NaOH and Na2SiO3 as the alkali activator. The prepared concrete was prepared and oven and ambient air for 7, 14-, 21-, and 28-day periods. The cured concrete was then subjected to density measurement, compressive strength (CS) test, chemical composition analysis, and shielding characterisation. The density and CS increased from 2.56 g/cm<sup>3</sup> to 2.79 g/cm<sup>3 </sup>and 21.34 MPa to 39.67 MPa for OPC-based control concrete (OPC-CC), respectively, while the corresponding ranges for geopolymer-based concrete (GP_CC) were 2.81 g/cm3 –3.87 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and 23.32 MPa –43.52 MPa as the curing period increased. OPC-CC had higher CaO content, while the silicate content of GP_CC was relatively higher. For OPC_CC the mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) decreased from maximum values of 17.2368 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 38.145 cm<sup>-1</sup> to 0.0232 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 0.0513 cm<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. On the other hand, the range of MACs and LACs for GP-CC are 0.0225 cm<sup>2</sup>/g – 14.5582 cm<sup>2</sup>/g and 0.0546 cm<sup>-1</sup>– 35.2455 cm<sup>-1</sup>. The fast neutron removal cross-section of GP_CC was higher than that of OPC_CC. The gamma photon and fast neutron interacting abilities of GP_CC was better than that of OPC_CC for gamma energies above 0.40 MeV. The shielding ability of GP_CC was comparable to some traditional shielding materials. The GP_CC can be used for radiation shielding concrete in radiation facilities.

Confluence Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.