Evaluations of Comet Assay Data Through Statistical Analysis, Machine Learning, and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Genotoxic Potential of Food Sweeteners

Although the genotoxic effects of food sweeteners have been studied previously, there is still a lack of application using an integrated approach that combines statistical analysis, Machine Learning (ML), and Multi-Criteria Decision Methods (MCDM) in depth to reveal the DNA-damaging potential of food sweeteners (D-Sorbitol (DS) and Xylitol (XYL)), both alone and in combination (DSX). A dataset on comet assay observations for DNA damage (tail length, tail intensity, and tail moment) was collected from previous studies. Kruskal-Wallis and One-Way ANOVA tests were used to identify significant differences in DNA damage. K-Means and Hierarchical Clustering lead to grouping additives of genotoxic effects, while MOORA and TOPSIS ranked toxicity levels. The findings of MCDM showed that XYL_1000 caused the highest DNA damage (0.726683 and 0.382296). The combination of DS and XYL (DSX_M8) exhibited higher toxicity (0.715258 and 0.37281) compared to their treatments, whereas DSX_M1 revealed the least damaging effect (0.235688 and 0.0324946). This is the first study using this approach. These findings highlight the impact of combining ML and MCDM methods for a more intensive genotoxicity evaluation, providing precious insights into food safety regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1581396
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluations of Comet Assay Data Through Statistical Analysis, Machine Learning, and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Genotoxic Potential of Food Sweeteners

Reşat Kasap, Fatma Ünal, Muhlis Özdemir, Fatma Okuş et al.
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Evaluations of Comet Assay Data Through Statistical Analysis, Machine Learning, and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Genotoxic Potential of Food Sweeteners

Reşat Kasap, Fatma Ünal, Muhlis Özdemir, Fatma Okuş, Deniz Yüzbaşıoğlu, Ece Akbaş, Ece Avuloğlu-Yılmaz, Sevcan Mamur, Büşra Güneş
article en

Abstract

Although the genotoxic effects of food sweeteners have been studied previously, there is still a lack of application using an integrated approach that combines statistical analysis, Machine Learning (ML), and Multi-Criteria Decision Methods (MCDM) in depth to reveal the DNA-damaging potential of food sweeteners (D-Sorbitol (DS) and Xylitol (XYL)), both alone and in combination (DSX). A dataset on comet assay observations for DNA damage (tail length, tail intensity, and tail moment) was collected from previous studies. Kruskal-Wallis and One-Way ANOVA tests were used to identify significant differences in DNA damage. K-Means and Hierarchical Clustering lead to grouping additives of genotoxic effects, while MOORA and TOPSIS ranked toxicity levels. The findings of MCDM showed that XYL_1000 caused the highest DNA damage (0.726683 and 0.382296). The combination of DS and XYL (DSX_M8) exhibited higher toxicity (0.715258 and 0.37281) compared to their treatments, whereas DSX_M1 revealed the least damaging effect (0.235688 and 0.0324946). This is the first study using this approach. These findings highlight the impact of combining ML and MCDM methods for a more intensive genotoxicity evaluation, providing precious insights into food safety regulations.

GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCEVol. 38(3)
Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Amasya Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.