Approaches for fully automated parameter estimation of mixtures of factor analysers

Mixture of factor analysers (MFA) are popular tools for dimension reduction and model-based clustering. The conventional method of parameter estimation for MFA is via maximum likelihood using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This typically assumes the number of components ( g ) and the number of factors ( q ) to be known a priori , which are often not known in practice. This article reviews different approaches for automatically inferring g and/or q from the data. A hybrid method, incremental automated MFA (IAMFA), is also proposed. We conduct a systematic comparison of these methods using simulated data and analyse their relative performance across various scenarios, looking at their ability to infer g and q correctly, the general model fit, clustering accuracy, and computation time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Modelling
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082x251355668
Primary Topic
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approaches for fully automated parameter estimation of mixtures of factor analysers

Sharon Lee, Gary Glonek, J. R. Davey
Statistical Modelling
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
article

Approaches for fully automated parameter estimation of mixtures of factor analysers

Sharon Lee, Gary Glonek, J. R. Davey
article en

Abstract

Mixture of factor analysers (MFA) are popular tools for dimension reduction and model-based clustering. The conventional method of parameter estimation for MFA is via maximum likelihood using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This typically assumes the number of components ( g ) and the number of factors ( q ) to be known a priori , which are often not known in practice. This article reviews different approaches for automatically inferring g and/or q from the data. A hybrid method, incremental automated MFA (IAMFA), is also proposed. We conduct a systematic comparison of these methods using simulated data and analyse their relative performance across various scenarios, looking at their ability to infer g and q correctly, the general model fit, clustering accuracy, and computation time.

Statistical ModellingVol. 25(6)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.