Generative AI and Democratic Culture

Abstract The purported threats that the algorithmic creation, ordering, and manipulation of information in the digital sphere may pose to democracy have received considerable academic attention in recent years. In seeking to extend this discussion beyond the focus on formal and procedural aspects of democracy, this paper adopts a Deweyan conception of democracy and considers specifically the potential impact of generative-AI technologies (genAI) on democratic culture . This, we argue, reveals underexplored democratic challenges posed by such increasingly ubiquitous technologies. As a flourishing democratic culture is fundamentally dependent on its epistemic richness and diversity, this directs one to consider if and how the use of genAI technologies might undermine these aspects. Both the technical architecture of genAI and the specific ways they are used in ordinary life demonstrate their ability to intercede in or mediate epistemic participation in democratic culture and, importantly, their tendency to advance dominant epistemic norms and practices. As such, we discuss how genAI might further epistemic injustices that negatively impact democratic culture in still underappreciated but salient ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00953-x
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and Democratic Culture

E. Soulier, Jason Branford, Laura Fichtner
1 links
Philosophy & Technology
Digital Education and Society
article

Generative AI and Democratic Culture

E. Soulier, Jason Branford, Laura Fichtner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purported threats that the algorithmic creation, ordering, and manipulation of information in the digital sphere may pose to democracy have received considerable academic attention in recent years. In seeking to extend this discussion beyond the focus on formal and procedural aspects of democracy, this paper adopts a Deweyan conception of democracy and considers specifically the potential impact of generative-AI technologies (genAI) on democratic culture . This, we argue, reveals underexplored democratic challenges posed by such increasingly ubiquitous technologies. As a flourishing democratic culture is fundamentally dependent on its epistemic richness and diversity, this directs one to consider if and how the use of genAI technologies might undermine these aspects. Both the technical architecture of genAI and the specific ways they are used in ordinary life demonstrate their ability to intercede in or mediate epistemic participation in democratic culture and, importantly, their tendency to advance dominant epistemic norms and practices. As such, we discuss how genAI might further epistemic injustices that negatively impact democratic culture in still underappreciated but salient ways.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation, Universität Hamburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI and Democratic Culture — E. Soulier, Jason Branford, et al. · Philosophy & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS