Kneeling to violent men: Investors and insurrection in Imperial Russia

Where people face immature or contested political institutions – a characteristic of many lower-income countries – the lack of access to the ballot box may result in political violence. Terrorism, uprisings, and other forms of individual or collective action to shift power may result in damage, fatalities, and, above all, uncertainty about what is to happen next. How then do businesses respond to political violence? This paper argues that political violence can be an alternative way in which to understand business history in difficult environments, creating less of a ‘rupture’ in the history of a firm than a ‘structural break’. By using stock prices and popular press, researchers can triangulate the strategic responses of firms and sectors to political uncertainty. This methodological framework is developed using political violence in one country, Russia during the nineteenth century, to show the effect of such violence on firms and their environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business History
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2025.2537690
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kneeling to violent men: Investors and insurrection in Imperial Russia

Christopher A. Hartwell
Business History
Soviet and Russian History
article

Kneeling to violent men: Investors and insurrection in Imperial Russia

Christopher A. Hartwell
article en

Abstract

Where people face immature or contested political institutions – a characteristic of many lower-income countries – the lack of access to the ballot box may result in political violence. Terrorism, uprisings, and other forms of individual or collective action to shift power may result in damage, fatalities, and, above all, uncertainty about what is to happen next. How then do businesses respond to political violence? This paper argues that political violence can be an alternative way in which to understand business history in difficult environments, creating less of a ‘rupture’ in the history of a firm than a ‘structural break’. By using stock prices and popular press, researchers can triangulate the strategic responses of firms and sectors to political uncertainty. This methodological framework is developed using political violence in one country, Russia during the nineteenth century, to show the effect of such violence on firms and their environment.

Business History
Kozminski University (PL), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.