Environmental Collaborative Governance in a Centralized System: The Case of the Chinese River Chief System

Collaborative governance in environmental management faces persistent challenges across political systems. This study examines how such governance unfolds under a centralized political system by analyzing China’s River Chief System in the Tai Lake watershed. Building on the collaborative governance regimes framework developed by Emerson, this study proposes an “action-first” collaborative governance framework that captures a two-stage evolution: an initial phase marked by the urgent, top-down deployment of collaborative actions with partial coupling of the three dynamics—principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action; and a subsequent phase of comprehensive collaboration characterized by the full coupling of these dynamics through institutionalized, rule-based, and multi-actor governance practices. Our findings suggest that while the core issues of collaborative governance are universal, the solutions may diverge significantly based on political context. This research provides a nuanced understanding of how China’s experiences can inform and enhance collaborative governance practices in centralized governance settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Public Administration Review
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251358459
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Collaborative Governance in a Centralized System: The Case of the Chinese River Chief System

Yahua Wang, Hairong Lv, Xiangning Chen
2 citations
Chinese Public Administration Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
article

Environmental Collaborative Governance in a Centralized System: The Case of the Chinese River Chief System

Yahua Wang, Hairong Lv, Xiangning Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Collaborative governance in environmental management faces persistent challenges across political systems. This study examines how such governance unfolds under a centralized political system by analyzing China’s River Chief System in the Tai Lake watershed. Building on the collaborative governance regimes framework developed by Emerson, this study proposes an “action-first” collaborative governance framework that captures a two-stage evolution: an initial phase marked by the urgent, top-down deployment of collaborative actions with partial coupling of the three dynamics—principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action; and a subsequent phase of comprehensive collaboration characterized by the full coupling of these dynamics through institutionalized, rule-based, and multi-actor governance practices. Our findings suggest that while the core issues of collaborative governance are universal, the solutions may diverge significantly based on political context. This research provides a nuanced understanding of how China’s experiences can inform and enhance collaborative governance practices in centralized governance settings.

Chinese Public Administration ReviewVol. 16(3)
China People's Public Security University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.