Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Levels of Faculty of Health Sciences Students and Affecting Factors

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology advancements are poised to bring significant changes to the healthcare field. As the adoption of AI systems in healthcare continues to grow, there is an increasing need to equip future healthcare professionals with the necessary knowledge and skills to work effectively with these technologies. This study explores the level of anxiety related to AI and examines the factors influencing this anxiety among university students enrolled in health sciences programs. Methods: This cross-sectional study was descriptive and correlational. The study was carried out with 450 students at the İstanbul Gedik University, Faculty of Health Sciences (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Child Development, Nutrition and Diet, Occupational Health and Safety). A descriptive questionnaire and an AI anxiety scale were used to obtain the research data, which were analyzed using numerical data, descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, independent groups t-test, and post-hoc analysis. Results: The mean total score on the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale (AIAS) was 109.642 ± 30.452 (min=42;max=147). Among the sub-dimensions of the AIAS, the mean of the Learning sub-dimension was 41.096 ± 12.083 (min=16; max=56), the mean of the Job Change sub-dimension was 31.118 ± 9.022 (min=12; max=42), the mean of the Sociotechnical Blindness sub-dimension was 21.558 ± 5.892 (min=8; max=28), and the mean of the AI Configuration sub-dimension was 15.871 ± 4.831 (min=6; max=21). Conclusion: According to this study, students from the Faculty of Health Sciences had a high level of AI anxiety. Significant differences were found between students’ AI anxiety levels according to gender, their thoughts about AI, their trust in AI-based devices, their desire to change their profession because of AI, and their use of AI in patient care.Cite this article as: Çoban N, Kar D, Berk ŞN. Artificial intelligence anxiety levels of faculty of health sciences students and affecting factors. Arch Health Sci Res. 2025; 12, 0147, doi: 10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2025.24147.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Health Science and Research
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/archealthscires.2025.24147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Levels of Faculty of Health Sciences Students and Affecting Factors

Stephen N. Berk, Niran ÇOBAN, Damla KAR
2 citations
Archives of Health Science and Research
Health and Well-being Studies
4.61
article

Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Levels of Faculty of Health Sciences Students and Affecting Factors

Stephen N. Berk, Niran ÇOBAN, Damla KAR
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology advancements are poised to bring significant changes to the healthcare field. As the adoption of AI systems in healthcare continues to grow, there is an increasing need to equip future healthcare professionals with the necessary knowledge and skills to work effectively with these technologies. This study explores the level of anxiety related to AI and examines the factors influencing this anxiety among university students enrolled in health sciences programs. Methods: This cross-sectional study was descriptive and correlational. The study was carried out with 450 students at the İstanbul Gedik University, Faculty of Health Sciences (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Child Development, Nutrition and Diet, Occupational Health and Safety). A descriptive questionnaire and an AI anxiety scale were used to obtain the research data, which were analyzed using numerical data, descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, independent groups t-test, and post-hoc analysis. Results: The mean total score on the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale (AIAS) was 109.642 ± 30.452 (min=42;max=147). Among the sub-dimensions of the AIAS, the mean of the Learning sub-dimension was 41.096 ± 12.083 (min=16; max=56), the mean of the Job Change sub-dimension was 31.118 ± 9.022 (min=12; max=42), the mean of the Sociotechnical Blindness sub-dimension was 21.558 ± 5.892 (min=8; max=28), and the mean of the AI Configuration sub-dimension was 15.871 ± 4.831 (min=6; max=21). Conclusion: According to this study, students from the Faculty of Health Sciences had a high level of AI anxiety. Significant differences were found between students’ AI anxiety levels according to gender, their thoughts about AI, their trust in AI-based devices, their desire to change their profession because of AI, and their use of AI in patient care.Cite this article as: Çoban N, Kar D, Berk ŞN. Artificial intelligence anxiety levels of faculty of health sciences students and affecting factors. Arch Health Sci Res. 2025; 12, 0147, doi: 10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2025.24147.

Archives of Health Science and ResearchVol. 12(1)
Türkisch-Deutsche Universität (TR), Okan University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health and Well-being Studies
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.