Use of a Monocular Head-Worn Display in Lieu of a Head-Up Display for Commercial Aircraft Approach and Landing With an Enhanced Flight Vision System: Considerations for Safety and Usability

An experiment was conducted to determine whether pilot performance, workload, and usability during low-visibility approaches and landings differed depending on whether pilots flew with a HUD or a monocular HWD, as well as whether they flew with or without an Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS). Eleven Part 121 flight crews flew SA CAT I approach and landing scenarios using a HUD and a monocular HWD with and without an EFVS in a Boeing 737 Level D-equivalent simulator. Findings suggest that a monocular HWD may not have a significant impact on a pilot’s ability to manage the flightpath during a routine SA CAT I operation with or without an EFVS; however, the monocular HWD elevated pilot workload. Pilots reported that the EFVS enhanced their awareness of the runway environment when transitioning from instrument to visual flight references; however, it was reported to interfere with natural runway visibility when transitioning to landing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251361897
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of a Monocular Head-Worn Display in Lieu of a Head-Up Display for Commercial Aircraft Approach and Landing With an Enhanced Flight Vision System: Considerations for Safety and Usability

Theodore C. Mofle, David C. Newton, Inchul Choi, Farzaneh Shahini et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Use of a Monocular Head-Worn Display in Lieu of a Head-Up Display for Commercial Aircraft Approach and Landing With an Enhanced Flight Vision System: Considerations for Safety and Usability

Theodore C. Mofle, David C. Newton, Inchul Choi, Farzaneh Shahini, Hanna C. Knight
article en

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine whether pilot performance, workload, and usability during low-visibility approaches and landings differed depending on whether pilots flew with a HUD or a monocular HWD, as well as whether they flew with or without an Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS). Eleven Part 121 flight crews flew SA CAT I approach and landing scenarios using a HUD and a monocular HWD with and without an EFVS in a Boeing 737 Level D-equivalent simulator. Findings suggest that a monocular HWD may not have a significant impact on a pilot’s ability to manage the flightpath during a routine SA CAT I operation with or without an EFVS; however, the monocular HWD elevated pilot workload. Pilots reported that the EFVS enhanced their awareness of the runway environment when transitioning from instrument to visual flight references; however, it was reported to interfere with natural runway visibility when transitioning to landing.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Federal Aviation Administration (US), Cherokee Nation (US)
Federal Aviation Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Use of a Monocular Head-Worn Display in Lieu of a Head-Up Display for Commercial Aircraft Approach and Landing With an Enhanced Flight Vision System: Considerations for Safety and Usability — Theodore C. Mofle, David C. Newton, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS