Buyer Power and the Effect of Vertical Integration on Innovation

ABSTRACT Our article investigates the impact of vertical integration (without foreclosure) on innovation. We compare cases where either (i) two manufacturers or (ii) a manufacturer and a vertically integrated retailer invest. Then, the independent manufacturer(s) and the retailer bargain over nonlinear contracts before selling to consumers. We show that vertical integration always increases the incentives to invest in the integrated product, which stifles (resp. spurs) the investment of the independent manufacturer when spillovers are low (resp. high). In contrast, when investments are sequential, if the buyer power is high, and the independent manufacturer chooses its investment first, it invests more (resp. less) to discourage the integrated retailer's investment when spillovers are low (resp. high). Furthermore, vertical integration is always profitable even when it is not desirable for the industry and welfare. Overall, vertical integration is desirable for the industry when the buyer power is high, and may harm welfare when both the buyer power and spillovers are low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70002
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buyer Power and the Effect of Vertical Integration on Innovation

Morgane Guignard, Claire Chambolle
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Buyer Power and the Effect of Vertical Integration on Innovation

Morgane Guignard, Claire Chambolle
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our article investigates the impact of vertical integration (without foreclosure) on innovation. We compare cases where either (i) two manufacturers or (ii) a manufacturer and a vertically integrated retailer invest. Then, the independent manufacturer(s) and the retailer bargain over nonlinear contracts before selling to consumers. We show that vertical integration always increases the incentives to invest in the integrated product, which stifles (resp. spurs) the investment of the independent manufacturer when spillovers are low (resp. high). In contrast, when investments are sequential, if the buyer power is high, and the independent manufacturer chooses its investment first, it invests more (resp. less) to discourage the integrated retailer's investment when spillovers are low (resp. high). Furthermore, vertical integration is always profitable even when it is not desirable for the industry and welfare. Overall, vertical integration is desirable for the industry when the buyer power is high, and may harm welfare when both the buyer power and spillovers are low.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
German Institute for Economic Research (DE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.