Does Educator Preparation Align with State Standards? A Factor Analysis of Missouri’s First-Year Teacher Survey

First-Year Teacher Surveys (FYTS) are essential for evaluating teacher preparation programs (TPPs), providing crucial feedback from recent graduates about their training and readiness for real-world teaching. This study focuses on Missouri’s FYTS, utilizing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to investigate the survey's factor structure and its alignment with the state's nine teaching standards. The study sample consisted of 1,424 first-year teachers who completed the FYTS during the 2023 academic year. EFA revealed eight distinct factors, largely corresponding to the original standards, while CFA results supported the multidimensional factor structure with significant item loadings. Although model fit indices indicated areas for potential refinement, overall findings affirm the survey’s construct validity. The high response rates and alignment with professional standards underscore the survey's utility for accountability and program improvement. Recommendations include enhancing item clarity and exploring additional refinements to improve model fit. The study discusses implications for practice, emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation of TPPs and the utilization of survey data to inform program improvements. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts of TPP enhancements and validate the FYTS in diverse contexts. The FYTS can serve as a model for other states in implementing effective TPP assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mid-western educational researcher
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25035/mwer.37.01.08
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Educator Preparation Align with State Standards? A Factor Analysis of Missouri’s First-Year Teacher Survey

Mark C. Hogrebe, Beth Kania-Gosche, Ximena Uribe‐Zarain
Mid-western educational researcher
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Does Educator Preparation Align with State Standards? A Factor Analysis of Missouri’s First-Year Teacher Survey

Mark C. Hogrebe, Beth Kania-Gosche, Ximena Uribe‐Zarain
article en

Abstract

First-Year Teacher Surveys (FYTS) are essential for evaluating teacher preparation programs (TPPs), providing crucial feedback from recent graduates about their training and readiness for real-world teaching. This study focuses on Missouri’s FYTS, utilizing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to investigate the survey's factor structure and its alignment with the state's nine teaching standards. The study sample consisted of 1,424 first-year teachers who completed the FYTS during the 2023 academic year. EFA revealed eight distinct factors, largely corresponding to the original standards, while CFA results supported the multidimensional factor structure with significant item loadings. Although model fit indices indicated areas for potential refinement, overall findings affirm the survey’s construct validity. The high response rates and alignment with professional standards underscore the survey's utility for accountability and program improvement. Recommendations include enhancing item clarity and exploring additional refinements to improve model fit. The study discusses implications for practice, emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation of TPPs and the utilization of survey data to inform program improvements. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts of TPP enhancements and validate the FYTS in diverse contexts. The FYTS can serve as a model for other states in implementing effective TPP assessments.

Mid-western educational researcherVol. 37(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.