Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows Around Two Canoe Paddles

ABSTRACT: In competitive canoe racing, advances in hydrodynamic technologies are a driving force in improving performance. Reshaping the paddle is one way to accomplish this. Currently, there are many studies on hull design and biomechanical analysis, but few have taken on paddle shape optimization. In our work, we have analyzed two different canoe paddle designs, having straight and curved blades respectively, which are manufactured by GRB Newman Designs [1]. Based on video analysis of the sport and experiments performed with strain gauges and other measurement techniques, it was found that the propulsive forces generated by paddlers result in a Reynolds number of roughly 200,000 [2]. Using ANSYS Fluent, we can quantify the differences in hydrodynamic performance between curved and straight canoe paddles. Turbulence modeling, specifically, wall-modeled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES), was adopted to analyze the fluid dynamics and compare the relative efficiency of these two paddle designs using high-performance computation (HPC). Analysis of a square cylinder was performed to demonstrate the capability of the model [3]. Following the validation study, the LES model was employed to assess the performance of a curved-blade canoe paddle against a straight-blade paddle. To predict the propulsive force that the paddle produces, an analysis of the catching (80°), and middle (90°) phases of the stroke was conducted. Fluid flow around the paddles exhibited significant differences in velocities and pressure near the tips of the blades. The following figures have been post-processed to help convey the difference in flow associated with the straight and curved blades at two different phases of a paddle stroke. The axes X, Y, and Z have been normalized by the blade width w. REFERENCES [1] https://www.grbnewmandesigns.com [2] Morgoch D. and Tullis S., 2011 “Force analysis of a sprint canoe blade”. Sports Engineering and Technology, 225:253-258 https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111407793 [3] Saeedi M. and Wang B., 2016. “Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow around a finite-height wall-mounted square cylinder within a thin boundary layer”. Flow Turbulence Combustion, 97:513–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9700-7

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-97830
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows Around Two Canoe Paddles

C. Y. Liang, Peter Parrish
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows Around Two Canoe Paddles

C. Y. Liang, Peter Parrish
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In competitive canoe racing, advances in hydrodynamic technologies are a driving force in improving performance. Reshaping the paddle is one way to accomplish this. Currently, there are many studies on hull design and biomechanical analysis, but few have taken on paddle shape optimization. In our work, we have analyzed two different canoe paddle designs, having straight and curved blades respectively, which are manufactured by GRB Newman Designs [1]. Based on video analysis of the sport and experiments performed with strain gauges and other measurement techniques, it was found that the propulsive forces generated by paddlers result in a Reynolds number of roughly 200,000 [2]. Using ANSYS Fluent, we can quantify the differences in hydrodynamic performance between curved and straight canoe paddles. Turbulence modeling, specifically, wall-modeled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES), was adopted to analyze the fluid dynamics and compare the relative efficiency of these two paddle designs using high-performance computation (HPC). Analysis of a square cylinder was performed to demonstrate the capability of the model [3]. Following the validation study, the LES model was employed to assess the performance of a curved-blade canoe paddle against a straight-blade paddle. To predict the propulsive force that the paddle produces, an analysis of the catching (80°), and middle (90°) phases of the stroke was conducted. Fluid flow around the paddles exhibited significant differences in velocities and pressure near the tips of the blades. The following figures have been post-processed to help convey the difference in flow associated with the straight and curved blades at two different phases of a paddle stroke. The axes X, Y, and Z have been normalized by the blade width w. REFERENCES [1] https://www.grbnewmandesigns.com [2] Morgoch D. and Tullis S., 2011 “Force analysis of a sprint canoe blade”. Sports Engineering and Technology, 225:253-258 https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111407793 [3] Saeedi M. and Wang B., 2016. “Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow around a finite-height wall-mounted square cylinder within a thin boundary layer”. Flow Turbulence Combustion, 97:513–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9700-7

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.