The role of agricultural cooperatives in improving mechanization levels: Differences between outsourcing machinery services and household‐owned machines

Abstract Although mechanization is reshaping rural and agricultural development by reducing drudgery through substituting farm labourers, improving input use efficiency and increasing farm productivity, the level of mechanization in developing countries still needs improvements. This study explores whether agricultural cooperatives can improve mechanization levels by investigating the differences between outsourcing machinery services and household‐owned machines. We consider mechanization adoption status and the mechanized ratio at different production stages, including tillage, seeding, pesticide spraying, fertilization and harvesting. Utilizing data collected by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and an inverse‐probability‐weighted regression adjustment estimator, we find that, overall, agricultural cooperatives significantly increase the probability of farmers’ adoption of mechanization for tillage, seeding, pesticide spraying, fertilization and harvesting by 5%–38% and mechanization ratios by 6%–29%. Disaggregated analyses reveal that agricultural cooperatives significantly increase the adoption probabilities and ratios of machines provided by outsourcing services by 9%–102% and 10%–79%, respectively. Among household‐owned machines, agricultural cooperatives only significantly impact tillage adoption, reducing farmers’ adoption probability and ratio by around 16%–21%. Our findings highlight the importance of agricultural cooperatives in improving farmers’ access to and use of machines provided by outsourcing services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.70011
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of agricultural cooperatives in improving mechanization levels: Differences between outsourcing machinery services and household‐owned machines

Edinam Dope Setsoafia, Wanglin Ma, Amaka Nnaji, Junpeng Li
4 citations
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
19.33
article

The role of agricultural cooperatives in improving mechanization levels: Differences between outsourcing machinery services and household‐owned machines

Edinam Dope Setsoafia, Wanglin Ma, Amaka Nnaji, Junpeng Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although mechanization is reshaping rural and agricultural development by reducing drudgery through substituting farm labourers, improving input use efficiency and increasing farm productivity, the level of mechanization in developing countries still needs improvements. This study explores whether agricultural cooperatives can improve mechanization levels by investigating the differences between outsourcing machinery services and household‐owned machines. We consider mechanization adoption status and the mechanized ratio at different production stages, including tillage, seeding, pesticide spraying, fertilization and harvesting. Utilizing data collected by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and an inverse‐probability‐weighted regression adjustment estimator, we find that, overall, agricultural cooperatives significantly increase the probability of farmers’ adoption of mechanization for tillage, seeding, pesticide spraying, fertilization and harvesting by 5%–38% and mechanization ratios by 6%–29%. Disaggregated analyses reveal that agricultural cooperatives significantly increase the adoption probabilities and ratios of machines provided by outsourcing services by 9%–102% and 10%–79%, respectively. Among household‐owned machines, agricultural cooperatives only significantly impact tillage adoption, reducing farmers’ adoption probability and ratio by around 16%–21%. Our findings highlight the importance of agricultural cooperatives in improving farmers’ access to and use of machines provided by outsourcing services.

Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Lincoln University (NZ), University of Washington (US), Huaiyin Normal University (CN), University for Development Studies (GH)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
19.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.