Current status of materials for posterior indirect adhesive restorations

The current materials for manufacturing posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR) can be divided into ceramics, resin composite materials, and hybrid materials. Each one presents different composition, mechanical and optical properties, manufacturing techniques, and survival rates. The aim of this article was to review relevant materials and techniques currently available for manufacturing PIAR. A review of literature for randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and literature reviews related to PIAR was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scielo. It is concluded that these materials show high durability and a good clinical performance. Furthermore, the survival rates of these restorations are over 90% for dental ceramics and over 85% for resin composites in the first couple of years with a minimum decrease over time. Thus, PIAR are a conservative and predictable option for restorations of posterior teeth and the choice of material used should always be weighed together with different factors including antagonist material, parafunctional habits, esthetics, and treatment cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Facultad de Odontología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v37n2e354646
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current status of materials for posterior indirect adhesive restorations

Lidia Yileng Tay, Diego Melendez, Janett Mas-López
4 links
Revista Facultad de Odontología
Dental materials and restorations
article

Current status of materials for posterior indirect adhesive restorations

Lidia Yileng Tay, Diego Melendez, Janett Mas-López
article en

Abstract

The current materials for manufacturing posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR) can be divided into ceramics, resin composite materials, and hybrid materials. Each one presents different composition, mechanical and optical properties, manufacturing techniques, and survival rates. The aim of this article was to review relevant materials and techniques currently available for manufacturing PIAR. A review of literature for randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and literature reviews related to PIAR was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scielo. It is concluded that these materials show high durability and a good clinical performance. Furthermore, the survival rates of these restorations are over 90% for dental ceramics and over 85% for resin composites in the first couple of years with a minimum decrease over time. Thus, PIAR are a conservative and predictable option for restorations of posterior teeth and the choice of material used should always be weighed together with different factors including antagonist material, parafunctional habits, esthetics, and treatment cost.

Revista Facultad de OdontologíaVol. 37(2)
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.