Social risk and performance assessment of battery raw materials: implications for sustainable sourcing and social LCA

Abstract Purpose The increase in demand for raw materials of an electric vehicle (EV) which is mainly composed of NMC (nickel, manganese, and cobalt) lithium-ion battery (Li-NMC) brings significant social impacts to the various stakeholders involved in the mining and processing of these minerals, including workers, local communities, society, and actors in the value chain. The EV battery supply chain also faces many challenges, including limited impact on the human rights and environmental practices of suppliers, as well as difficulty in ensuring that batteries are responsibly sourced. Indeed, all those elements have been listed as critical raw materials by the European Commission since 2017. To address this issue, it is necessary to understand the scale of the social burden associated with the production of these minerals and explore alternative supply chains or minerals with less impact. Methods Therefore, a social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) was conducted in this study, following the Guidelines of Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations (UNEP, 2020). The results of the S-LCA revealed social impacts at two levels: social risk (SR) at the country level and social performance (SP) at the company level. Results and discussion These impacts were found to be significantly negative, particularly in relation to child labor, health and safety, and forced labor in the mining and refining stages. The results also showed differences in the SP of each raw material, with manganese mining showing better SP, while cobalt, lithium, and nickel mining were found to have less SR. Conclusions The transition to EV involves many environmental, social, and governance challenges, and requires a comprehensive approach to identify companies that operate both profitably and responsibly in each stage of the EV supply chain. Understanding the risks and societal impacts associated with battery materials can help guide decision-making and promote the adoption of more sustainable and responsible practices in the EV industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02516-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social risk and performance assessment of battery raw materials: implications for sustainable sourcing and social LCA

Davis Jose, Marzia Traverso, Rose Nangah Mankaa
3 citations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
article

Social risk and performance assessment of battery raw materials: implications for sustainable sourcing and social LCA

Davis Jose, Marzia Traverso, Rose Nangah Mankaa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The increase in demand for raw materials of an electric vehicle (EV) which is mainly composed of NMC (nickel, manganese, and cobalt) lithium-ion battery (Li-NMC) brings significant social impacts to the various stakeholders involved in the mining and processing of these minerals, including workers, local communities, society, and actors in the value chain. The EV battery supply chain also faces many challenges, including limited impact on the human rights and environmental practices of suppliers, as well as difficulty in ensuring that batteries are responsibly sourced. Indeed, all those elements have been listed as critical raw materials by the European Commission since 2017. To address this issue, it is necessary to understand the scale of the social burden associated with the production of these minerals and explore alternative supply chains or minerals with less impact. Methods Therefore, a social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) was conducted in this study, following the Guidelines of Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations (UNEP, 2020). The results of the S-LCA revealed social impacts at two levels: social risk (SR) at the country level and social performance (SP) at the company level. Results and discussion These impacts were found to be significantly negative, particularly in relation to child labor, health and safety, and forced labor in the mining and refining stages. The results also showed differences in the SP of each raw material, with manganese mining showing better SP, while cobalt, lithium, and nickel mining were found to have less SR. Conclusions The transition to EV involves many environmental, social, and governance challenges, and requires a comprehensive approach to identify companies that operate both profitably and responsibly in each stage of the EV supply chain. Understanding the risks and societal impacts associated with battery materials can help guide decision-making and promote the adoption of more sustainable and responsible practices in the EV industry.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 30(10)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.