Treatment Delay and Type of Retraction Affect the Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: A Quantitative Analysis of 123 Patients

<b>Introduction</b>: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the trauma to surgery time interval (Tt-Ts) and the type of tendon retraction (unretracted vs. coiled) in distal biceps tendon ruptures (DBTRs) on the choice between primary tendon repair (PR) and tendon reconstruction with graft (RG). <b>Materials and Methods</b>: In total, 123 patients with surgically treated DBTRs were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: Group I-acute (75 patients with Tt-Ts < 21 days), Group II-subacute (20 patients with Tt-Ts between 21 and 45 days), and Group III-chronic (28 patients with Tt-Ts > 45 days). The type of surgical treatment (PR vs. RG) was evaluated in each group. The type of tendon retraction (unretracted vs. coiled) was analyzed in subacute and chronic lesions. A statistical analysis was performed. <b>Results:</b> The mean Tt-Ts interval in the overall sample was 59.3 days; in Group I, it was 9 days (range, 2-20); in Group II, it was 29 days (range, 22-42); and in Group III, it was 196 days (range, 45-1095). PR was performed in 100%, 90%, and 29% of the patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Coiled tendons were found in 60% and 71% of patients in Groups II and III, respectively. Among patients with coiled tendons, 2 and 20 received RG in Groups II and III, respectively. The Tt-Ts and the type of retraction were significantly associated with the choice of surgical treatment (PR vs. RG), with statistical differences between Group III and the other two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A cut-off of 43.5 days following injury was found to predict the need to perform RG with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 94%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. The likelihood of receiving RG rather than PR increased each day by 6%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Treatment delay significantly affects the choice of surgical technique in DBTRs. PR is feasible in 98% of acute and subacute ruptures, whereas RG is necessary in 70% of chronic ruptures. The type of tendon retraction affects the choice of treatment only in chronic lesions, as coiled tendons always require RG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13161977
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Delay and Type of Retraction Affect the Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: A Quantitative Analysis of 123 Patients

Alessandra Colozza, Davide Blonna, Andrea Amura, Pasquale Sessa et al.
1 links
Healthcare
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Treatment Delay and Type of Retraction Affect the Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: A Quantitative Analysis of 123 Patients

Alessandra Colozza, Davide Blonna, Andrea Amura, Pasquale Sessa, Giuseppe Giannicola, Sebastien Prigent
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the trauma to surgery time interval (Tt-Ts) and the type of tendon retraction (unretracted vs. coiled) in distal biceps tendon ruptures (DBTRs) on the choice between primary tendon repair (PR) and tendon reconstruction with graft (RG). <b>Materials and Methods</b>: In total, 123 patients with surgically treated DBTRs were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: Group I-acute (75 patients with Tt-Ts < 21 days), Group II-subacute (20 patients with Tt-Ts between 21 and 45 days), and Group III-chronic (28 patients with Tt-Ts > 45 days). The type of surgical treatment (PR vs. RG) was evaluated in each group. The type of tendon retraction (unretracted vs. coiled) was analyzed in subacute and chronic lesions. A statistical analysis was performed. <b>Results:</b> The mean Tt-Ts interval in the overall sample was 59.3 days; in Group I, it was 9 days (range, 2-20); in Group II, it was 29 days (range, 22-42); and in Group III, it was 196 days (range, 45-1095). PR was performed in 100%, 90%, and 29% of the patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Coiled tendons were found in 60% and 71% of patients in Groups II and III, respectively. Among patients with coiled tendons, 2 and 20 received RG in Groups II and III, respectively. The Tt-Ts and the type of retraction were significantly associated with the choice of surgical treatment (PR vs. RG), with statistical differences between Group III and the other two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A cut-off of 43.5 days following injury was found to predict the need to perform RG with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 94%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. The likelihood of receiving RG rather than PR increased each day by 6%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Treatment delay significantly affects the choice of surgical technique in DBTRs. PR is feasible in 98% of acute and subacute ruptures, whereas RG is necessary in 70% of chronic ruptures. The type of tendon retraction affects the choice of treatment only in chronic lesions, as coiled tendons always require RG.

HealthcareVol. 13(16)
CTO Hospital (IT), Ospedale per gli Infermi (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.