Networking supports crop diversity decisions: insights from the Gaillac wine-growing region (France)

The diversity of crop species and varieties is a key lever for promoting sustainable and resilient farming systems. Adopting new species and varieties requires knowledge tailored to specific crops. Farmers rely on diverse sources of knowledge to make cropping decisions, which depend on both the characteristics of the crops and the farmers themselves. Understanding the various pathways of knowledge transmission provides critical insights into the dynamics that either facilitate or constrain the local diffusion of crop diversity. This study examines how farmers engage with different social networks when selecting the three key components of grapevine cultivation: variety, clone, and rootstock. We combined social network analysis with ethnographic data to compare the composition (i.e., the sources involved), structure (i.e., the interactions between sources), and content of knowledge regarding grapevine selection in the Gaillac wine-growing region (France). Our results show that knowledge is predominantly obtained through social interactions with nearby farmers rather than through independent consultation of written sources, such as books and websites. Across all three networks, the most frequently cited knowledge providers were local experts with extensive experience managing diverse grapevine varieties. We found that grapevine varieties hold greater biocultural value for farmers than clones and rootstocks, shaping knowledge circulation networks. While varieties are central to farmers' concerns, clones and rootstocks are perceived as adjustment variables used to optimize yield and adapt to environmental conditions. As a result, farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange primarily revolves around grapevine varieties, whereas knowledge about clones and rootstocks is largely disseminated by vine nurseries. Our findings highlight the role of social relationships in sustaining agronomic knowledge about numerous rare and uncultivated varieties within the locality, which may bolster farmers' capacity to adapt to rapid social-ecological changes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-16152-300320
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Networking supports crop diversity decisions: insights from the Gaillac wine-growing region (France)

Sophie Caillon, Antoine Doncieux, Delphine Renard, Antoine Rignault
1 citations
Ecology and Society
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
1.75
article

Networking supports crop diversity decisions: insights from the Gaillac wine-growing region (France)

Sophie Caillon, Antoine Doncieux, Delphine Renard, Antoine Rignault
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The diversity of crop species and varieties is a key lever for promoting sustainable and resilient farming systems. Adopting new species and varieties requires knowledge tailored to specific crops. Farmers rely on diverse sources of knowledge to make cropping decisions, which depend on both the characteristics of the crops and the farmers themselves. Understanding the various pathways of knowledge transmission provides critical insights into the dynamics that either facilitate or constrain the local diffusion of crop diversity. This study examines how farmers engage with different social networks when selecting the three key components of grapevine cultivation: variety, clone, and rootstock. We combined social network analysis with ethnographic data to compare the composition (i.e., the sources involved), structure (i.e., the interactions between sources), and content of knowledge regarding grapevine selection in the Gaillac wine-growing region (France). Our results show that knowledge is predominantly obtained through social interactions with nearby farmers rather than through independent consultation of written sources, such as books and websites. Across all three networks, the most frequently cited knowledge providers were local experts with extensive experience managing diverse grapevine varieties. We found that grapevine varieties hold greater biocultural value for farmers than clones and rootstocks, shaping knowledge circulation networks. While varieties are central to farmers' concerns, clones and rootstocks are perceived as adjustment variables used to optimize yield and adapt to environmental conditions. As a result, farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange primarily revolves around grapevine varieties, whereas knowledge about clones and rootstocks is largely disseminated by vine nurseries. Our findings highlight the role of social relationships in sustaining agronomic knowledge about numerous rare and uncultivated varieties within the locality, which may bolster farmers' capacity to adapt to rapid social-ecological changes.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 30(3)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.