Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Assessment: Academic Professionals’ Perceptions of AI Grading in South Africa

This study explores the perceptions of academic professionals in South Africa regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in grading within higher education. In the current technological and digital era, the rapid integration of AI tools such as ChatGPT into academic environments points out that there is a growing need to understand how educators engage with these technologies, especially in assessment practices. This study adopted a mixed-methods explanatory design. The study first surveyed 56 academic professionals across diverse disciplines and then conducted semi-structured interviews with five participants to gain deeper qualitative insights. The study findings reveal a generally positive outlook toward AI-assisted grading, with many respondents acknowledging its potential to enhance efficiency, objectivity, and timely feedback. However, significant concerns emerged regarding the loss of qualitative judgment, contextual sensitivity, and the ethical implications of data use. The study highlights a disconnect between institutional support for AI adoption and the lack of structured training for academic staff. Participants expressed a clear preference for a hybrid grading model, combining AI tools with human oversight to preserve pedagogical integrity. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research underscores the importance of perceived usefulness and ease of use in driving AI adoption, while also emphasising the socio-cultural and ethical contexts unique to South African higher education. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive AI training, robust ethical frameworks, and inclusive policy dialogues to ensure responsible, context-aware implementation of AI in assessment. These findings offer critical insights for institutions seeking to balance innovation with educational equity and integrity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Technium Education and Humanities
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47577/teh.v11i.12908
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Assessment: Academic Professionals’ Perceptions of AI Grading in South Africa

Mahlatse Ragolane, John Phiri, Shahiem Patel
Technium Education and Humanities
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Assessment: Academic Professionals’ Perceptions of AI Grading in South Africa

Mahlatse Ragolane, John Phiri, Shahiem Patel
article en

Abstract

This study explores the perceptions of academic professionals in South Africa regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in grading within higher education. In the current technological and digital era, the rapid integration of AI tools such as ChatGPT into academic environments points out that there is a growing need to understand how educators engage with these technologies, especially in assessment practices. This study adopted a mixed-methods explanatory design. The study first surveyed 56 academic professionals across diverse disciplines and then conducted semi-structured interviews with five participants to gain deeper qualitative insights. The study findings reveal a generally positive outlook toward AI-assisted grading, with many respondents acknowledging its potential to enhance efficiency, objectivity, and timely feedback. However, significant concerns emerged regarding the loss of qualitative judgment, contextual sensitivity, and the ethical implications of data use. The study highlights a disconnect between institutional support for AI adoption and the lack of structured training for academic staff. Participants expressed a clear preference for a hybrid grading model, combining AI tools with human oversight to preserve pedagogical integrity. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research underscores the importance of perceived usefulness and ease of use in driving AI adoption, while also emphasising the socio-cultural and ethical contexts unique to South African higher education. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive AI training, robust ethical frameworks, and inclusive policy dialogues to ensure responsible, context-aware implementation of AI in assessment. These findings offer critical insights for institutions seeking to balance innovation with educational equity and integrity.

Technium Education and HumanitiesVol. 11
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Assessment: Academic Professionals’ Perceptions of AI Grading in South Africa — Mahlatse Ragolane, John Phiri, et al. · Technium Education and Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS