A Comparative Study of World University Rankings: Proposed Administrative Mechanisms to Improve the Ranking of Palestinian Universities

The study aimed to provide a comparison of the most important world university rankings, to show the similarities and differences between them, and to suggest appropriate administrative mechanisms to improve the ranking of Palestinian universities in these rankings. To achieve the study objectives, the researchers used descriptive analytical-synthetic methodology. The researchers came up with a presentation of the most important international university rankings; Shanghai, Times, Webometrics, QS, and Leiden, and explained the most important similarities and differences between them. They also presented the most appropriate administrative mechanisms to employ these rankings in order to improve the ranking of Palestinian universities in these rankings, specifically by establishing a special unit for global rankings, leadership, and strengthening partnerships and twinning with international universities with a high academic and research reputation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jordanian Educational Journal
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v10i2.1447
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of World University Rankings: Proposed Administrative Mechanisms to Improve the Ranking of Palestinian Universities

Rateb Salameh Al-Soud, Ibtihaj Abdel Hakam Al-Bakri
Jordanian Educational Journal
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

A Comparative Study of World University Rankings: Proposed Administrative Mechanisms to Improve the Ranking of Palestinian Universities

Rateb Salameh Al-Soud, Ibtihaj Abdel Hakam Al-Bakri
article en

Abstract

The study aimed to provide a comparison of the most important world university rankings, to show the similarities and differences between them, and to suggest appropriate administrative mechanisms to improve the ranking of Palestinian universities in these rankings. To achieve the study objectives, the researchers used descriptive analytical-synthetic methodology. The researchers came up with a presentation of the most important international university rankings; Shanghai, Times, Webometrics, QS, and Leiden, and explained the most important similarities and differences between them. They also presented the most appropriate administrative mechanisms to employ these rankings in order to improve the ranking of Palestinian universities in these rankings, specifically by establishing a special unit for global rankings, leadership, and strengthening partnerships and twinning with international universities with a high academic and research reputation.

Jordanian Educational JournalVol. 10(2)
University of Jordan (JO), Ministry of Higher Education (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of World University Rankings: Proposed Administrative Mechanisms to Improve the Ranking of Palestinian Universities — Rateb Salameh Al-Soud, Ibtihaj Abdel Hakam Al-Bakri · Jordanian Educational Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS