Taking account of typicality in calculation of likelihood ratios

Abstract When calculating a likelihood ratio with respect to the question of whether two items originated from the same source or from different sources, one must take account of not only the similarity between the items but also their typicality with respect to the relevant population. Using simple univariate examples, this article demonstrates that likelihood ratios calculated using specific-source and common-source methods do take account of typicality, but that likelihood ratios calculated from similarity scores do not. It also demonstrates that converting feature values to percentile-rank values before calculating similarity scores does not properly take account of typicality. The article argues that methods that do not take account of typicality should not be used, and that methods that do take account of typicality should be used instead. Since sufficient case-relevant data to train a specific-known-source model are seldom available, the article recommends that the method to use instead of the similarity-score method should usually be the common-source method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Probability and Risk
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking account of typicality in calculation of likelihood ratios

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
2 citations
Law Probability and Risk
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
4.96
article

Taking account of typicality in calculation of likelihood ratios

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract When calculating a likelihood ratio with respect to the question of whether two items originated from the same source or from different sources, one must take account of not only the similarity between the items but also their typicality with respect to the relevant population. Using simple univariate examples, this article demonstrates that likelihood ratios calculated using specific-source and common-source methods do take account of typicality, but that likelihood ratios calculated from similarity scores do not. It also demonstrates that converting feature values to percentile-rank values before calculating similarity scores does not properly take account of typicality. The article argues that methods that do not take account of typicality should not be used, and that methods that do take account of typicality should be used instead. Since sufficient case-relevant data to train a specific-known-source model are seldom available, the article recommends that the method to use instead of the similarity-score method should usually be the common-source method.

Law Probability and RiskVol. 24(1)
Aston University (GB), Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.