AI's effectiveness in language testing and feedback provision

Language assessment is essential for evaluating proficiency, but traditional assessment methods often lack scalability and objectivity. While Artificial Intelligence (AI) enables automated solutions, its pedagogical impact is still understudied. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the three most widely used AI-based tools (Grammarly, Duolingo, and ELSA Speak) for assessment of language and feedback provision. It seeks to explore the efficacy of AI, how AI accuracy is perceived, and the influence of AI on language learning outcomes. The study employed a mixed-method study design comprising quantitative and qualitative approaches involving 50 participants from diverse language learning backgrounds. Surveys and questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data. Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and observational studies were conducted to assess in-depth user experiences. Quantitative data was analyzed using ANOVA and regression analysis, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative analysis revealed a weak but statistically significant correlation between AI feedback and perceived learning outcomes (R2 = 0.08, p < 0.05). Users appreciated immediate error rectification via AI, especially in grammar and pronunciation, while also recording skepticism regarding their coherence, creativity, and discourse-level examination. The qualitative component reported mixed user trust while underscoring the technical and contextual limitations. Notably, utilization of feedback varied across findings while favoring structured assessments regarding AI use. AI tools, while being limited in their contextual judgment, still provide support for basic language corrections. Findings were reliant on general user perception, not including tool-specific efficacy. The study recommends a hybrid AI-human assessment model that balances efficiency with comprehensive assessment. Future research should focus on longitudinal research for tool-specific influences and adaptive feedback mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101892
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI's effectiveness in language testing and feedback provision

Ali Alshehri
4 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
9.92
article

AI's effectiveness in language testing and feedback provision

Ali Alshehri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Language assessment is essential for evaluating proficiency, but traditional assessment methods often lack scalability and objectivity. While Artificial Intelligence (AI) enables automated solutions, its pedagogical impact is still understudied. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the three most widely used AI-based tools (Grammarly, Duolingo, and ELSA Speak) for assessment of language and feedback provision. It seeks to explore the efficacy of AI, how AI accuracy is perceived, and the influence of AI on language learning outcomes. The study employed a mixed-method study design comprising quantitative and qualitative approaches involving 50 participants from diverse language learning backgrounds. Surveys and questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data. Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and observational studies were conducted to assess in-depth user experiences. Quantitative data was analyzed using ANOVA and regression analysis, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative analysis revealed a weak but statistically significant correlation between AI feedback and perceived learning outcomes (R2 = 0.08, p < 0.05). Users appreciated immediate error rectification via AI, especially in grammar and pronunciation, while also recording skepticism regarding their coherence, creativity, and discourse-level examination. The qualitative component reported mixed user trust while underscoring the technical and contextual limitations. Notably, utilization of feedback varied across findings while favoring structured assessments regarding AI use. AI tools, while being limited in their contextual judgment, still provide support for basic language corrections. Findings were reliant on general user perception, not including tool-specific efficacy. The study recommends a hybrid AI-human assessment model that balances efficiency with comprehensive assessment. Future research should focus on longitudinal research for tool-specific influences and adaptive feedback mechanisms.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 12
University of Bisha (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI's effectiveness in language testing and feedback provision — Ali Alshehri · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS