Extended versus standard pancreatectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumours: a single center cohort study on surgical and oncological outcomes

Abstract Introduction Pancreatic and periampullary cancers are associated with a poor prognosis. The only potentially curative treatment is surgery, and preferably combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to compare surgical and oncological outcomes between standard and extended pancreatectomy. Method Retrospective single-center study (2009–2022). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between standard and extended pancreatectomy (ISGPS definition). Long-term survival was compared across surgical and palliative groups. Result A total of 575 patients underwent resection with curative intent (125 extended, 450 standard). Preoperative comorbidities were similar. Extended pancreatectomy was associated with longer operative time (469vs. 420 min,p<0.001), greater blood loss (500 vs. 350 ml, p<0.001), more often both intraoperative transfusion (24% vs. 10%,p<0.001), and ICU stay (9%vs. 4%,p=0.042). Hospital stay, major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥3), readmissions, and 30-/90-day mortality did not differ. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in the extended group (85% vs. 76%,p=0.025), with similar completion rates (72%vs. 73%,p=0.945). Disease-free survival was shorter (13.3vs. 22.5 months,p<0.001), and estimated 5-year survival lower (18%vs. 30%,p<0.001). Median survival for standard surgery was 39.6 months, compared to 26.4 months for extended surgery, which was still longer than the palliative group (5.0 months). Median survival for patients with exploration without resection due to metastases or local owergrowth was 11.4 and 17.6 months. Discussion Extended pancreatectomy was associated with increased operative complexity but did not worsen morbidity or short-term mortality. Despite more adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term survival was worse compared to standard pancreatectomy. However, extended surgery provides a survival benefit over palliative treatment, offering a feasible option in selected patients with potentiall long-term benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf149.109
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended versus standard pancreatectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumours: a single center cohort study on surgical and oncological outcomes

Caroline Williamsson, Raquel Perez, Paulina Bereza‐Carlson, Bodil Andersson et al.
British journal of surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Extended versus standard pancreatectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumours: a single center cohort study on surgical and oncological outcomes

Caroline Williamsson, Raquel Perez, Paulina Bereza‐Carlson, Bodil Andersson, Elisabet Forkman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Pancreatic and periampullary cancers are associated with a poor prognosis. The only potentially curative treatment is surgery, and preferably combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to compare surgical and oncological outcomes between standard and extended pancreatectomy. Method Retrospective single-center study (2009–2022). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between standard and extended pancreatectomy (ISGPS definition). Long-term survival was compared across surgical and palliative groups. Result A total of 575 patients underwent resection with curative intent (125 extended, 450 standard). Preoperative comorbidities were similar. Extended pancreatectomy was associated with longer operative time (469vs. 420 min,p<0.001), greater blood loss (500 vs. 350 ml, p<0.001), more often both intraoperative transfusion (24% vs. 10%,p<0.001), and ICU stay (9%vs. 4%,p=0.042). Hospital stay, major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥3), readmissions, and 30-/90-day mortality did not differ. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in the extended group (85% vs. 76%,p=0.025), with similar completion rates (72%vs. 73%,p=0.945). Disease-free survival was shorter (13.3vs. 22.5 months,p<0.001), and estimated 5-year survival lower (18%vs. 30%,p<0.001). Median survival for standard surgery was 39.6 months, compared to 26.4 months for extended surgery, which was still longer than the palliative group (5.0 months). Median survival for patients with exploration without resection due to metastases or local owergrowth was 11.4 and 17.6 months. Discussion Extended pancreatectomy was associated with increased operative complexity but did not worsen morbidity or short-term mortality. Despite more adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term survival was worse compared to standard pancreatectomy. However, extended surgery provides a survival benefit over palliative treatment, offering a feasible option in selected patients with potentiall long-term benefits.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_11)
Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.