Rethinking TNM: tumor deposit-based prognostic models may improve N-staging in colorectal cancer

Abstract Introduction Tumor deposits (TDs) are an important negative prognostic factor for long-term oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer patients, independently of lymph node status. Several novel models have been proposed to further integrate TDs into the TNM-staging system, but their comparative performance remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify, compare and validate prognostic models incorporating TDs and/or TD-count for N-stage classification. Method A scoping literature review was conducted to identify novel prognostic models that further incorporated TDs or TD-count into N-staging. The identified models was validated using patient data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, assessing overall survival, distant metastasis, and local recurrence. Prognostic performance was compared to the TNM N-staging using Kaplan-Meier curves for visual analysis, Harrell’s C-index for discriminative ability, and Bayesian information criterion for model fit and complexity. Result Of 792 articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 10 unique models in addition to TNM. For the patient cohort, 26,970 patients remained after exclusion, of whom 3,312 (12%) had TDs. Comparative analysis showed all models were superior to TNM, with two models standing out; an integrated model combining lymph node count and TD-count, and a ratio model considering number of TDs, positive lymph nodes, and total extracted nodal structures. All models provided prognostic value, but differences were modest. Discussion This study demonstrated that although all models outperformed TNM, prognostic differences between the models were small. While TDs provide valuable prognostic information for high-risk patients, additional risk variables need to be included to further enhance the staging system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf149.053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking TNM: tumor deposit-based prognostic models may improve N-staging in colorectal cancer

Erik Agger, Simon Lundström, Fredrik Jörgren, Marie‐Louise Lydrup et al.
1 citations
British journal of surgery
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
article

Rethinking TNM: tumor deposit-based prognostic models may improve N-staging in colorectal cancer

Erik Agger, Simon Lundström, Fredrik Jörgren, Marie‐Louise Lydrup, Pamela Buchwald
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Tumor deposits (TDs) are an important negative prognostic factor for long-term oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer patients, independently of lymph node status. Several novel models have been proposed to further integrate TDs into the TNM-staging system, but their comparative performance remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify, compare and validate prognostic models incorporating TDs and/or TD-count for N-stage classification. Method A scoping literature review was conducted to identify novel prognostic models that further incorporated TDs or TD-count into N-staging. The identified models was validated using patient data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, assessing overall survival, distant metastasis, and local recurrence. Prognostic performance was compared to the TNM N-staging using Kaplan-Meier curves for visual analysis, Harrell’s C-index for discriminative ability, and Bayesian information criterion for model fit and complexity. Result Of 792 articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 10 unique models in addition to TNM. For the patient cohort, 26,970 patients remained after exclusion, of whom 3,312 (12%) had TDs. Comparative analysis showed all models were superior to TNM, with two models standing out; an integrated model combining lymph node count and TD-count, and a ratio model considering number of TDs, positive lymph nodes, and total extracted nodal structures. All models provided prognostic value, but differences were modest. Discussion This study demonstrated that although all models outperformed TNM, prognostic differences between the models were small. While TDs provide valuable prognostic information for high-risk patients, additional risk variables need to be included to further enhance the staging system.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_11)
Lund University (SE), Helsingborgs lasarett (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.