Introduction: Engagement or Rejection? Conservative Religion and Science in America Since 1960

This focus section examines how conservative religious institutions in the United States have engaged with science and higher education since the 1960s, blending faith with modern disciplines to assert traditionalist identities. The articles explore how institutions like Fuller Theological Seminary, Christendom College, and the Catholic Church have become active in psychology, biology, and biotechnology to reinforce traditionalist religious identities while appropriating modern academic and scientific methods. These efforts reflect a strategy of negotiating tensions between religious orthodoxy and secular modernity. By integrating faith with professional and scientific credibility, these institutions maintain conservative stances while participating in mainstream frameworks. Together, the three case studies reveal how conservative religious communities shape and are shaped by their interactions with modern scientific paradigms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isis
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/736901
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction: Engagement or Rejection? Conservative Religion and Science in America Since 1960

Axel Jansen, Stefanie Coché
1 citations
Isis
Religion and Society Interactions
4.20
article

Introduction: Engagement or Rejection? Conservative Religion and Science in America Since 1960

Axel Jansen, Stefanie Coché
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This focus section examines how conservative religious institutions in the United States have engaged with science and higher education since the 1960s, blending faith with modern disciplines to assert traditionalist identities. The articles explore how institutions like Fuller Theological Seminary, Christendom College, and the Catholic Church have become active in psychology, biology, and biotechnology to reinforce traditionalist religious identities while appropriating modern academic and scientific methods. These efforts reflect a strategy of negotiating tensions between religious orthodoxy and secular modernity. By integrating faith with professional and scientific credibility, these institutions maintain conservative stances while participating in mainstream frameworks. Together, the three case studies reveal how conservative religious communities shape and are shaped by their interactions with modern scientific paradigms.

IsisVol. 116(3)
Deutsches Historisches Institut Washington (US), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Religion and Society Interactions
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.