Technology readiness assessment of magnetohydrodynamic stability control

Abstract The technology readiness level scale is revised with clear definitions for magnetohydrodynamic stability control technologies for magnetic confinement fusion. The definitions are in the form of a sentence with three dimensions, which are the system complexity, the test environment, and the cost. A clear and simple definition is sought after to make an assessment based on the evidence which is agreeable to the fusion energy development community. A sample technology readiness assessment (TRA) for the electron cyclotron current drive-based control of neoclassical tearing mode for ST Advanced Reactor, using the proposed scale, reveals that the risk of a TRA being misinterpreted is high, which can only be avoided with an understanding of the procedure described in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/adfaad
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology readiness assessment of magnetohydrodynamic stability control

E. C. Howell, J.M. Hanson, N.C. Logan, R. N. Chandra et al.
1 citations
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
article

Technology readiness assessment of magnetohydrodynamic stability control

E. C. Howell, J.M. Hanson, N.C. Logan, R. N. Chandra, J.P. Levesque, F. Turco, J. Yang, J.W. Berkery, A. Reiman, D. P. Brennan, W. Boyes, S. Van Mulders, Evdokiya Kostadinova, Andrew Rothstein, Steve Sabbagh, Hiro Josep Farre Kaga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The technology readiness level scale is revised with clear definitions for magnetohydrodynamic stability control technologies for magnetic confinement fusion. The definitions are in the form of a sentence with three dimensions, which are the system complexity, the test environment, and the cost. A clear and simple definition is sought after to make an assessment based on the evidence which is agreeable to the fusion energy development community. A sample technology readiness assessment (TRA) for the electron cyclotron current drive-based control of neoclassical tearing mode for ST Advanced Reactor, using the proposed scale, reveals that the risk of a TRA being misinterpreted is high, which can only be avoided with an understanding of the procedure described in this paper.

Plasma Physics and Controlled FusionVol. 67(9)
ITER (FR), Princeton University (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US), RCA (United States) (US), Tech-X Corporation (United States) (US), General Atomics (United States) (US), Columbia University (US), Auburn University (US)
Fusion Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.