Implementation of The School-Based Feeding Program among Primary Pupils’ in San Mariano I District and Its Relation to Their Academic Performance

This study examined the implementation of the School-Based Feeding Program (SBFP) and its relationship to the academic performance of primary-grade pupils in San Mariano I District. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected from 215 identified pupils who were wasted or severely wasted, 70 teachers, and 60 parents. Findings revealed that after the 120-day feeding intervention, 161 out of 215 pupils (74.88%) achieved normal nutritional status, showing significant improvement from the pre-intervention figures of 76.7% wasted and 23.3% severely wasted. Academic performance results showed that 76.7% of pupils achieved at least a “Satisfactory” rating, with a mean general weighted average (GWA) of 81.03. However, the correlation between SBFP implementation and academic performance was found to be statistically insignificant (teachers’ r = –0.168, p = 0.082; parents’ r = –0.049, p = 0.356). On the other hand, a significant relationship was found between parents’ educational attainment and pupils’ academic performance (p < 0.05). Problems encountered included delayed budget release (85.7% of teachers; 96.7% of parents), lack of parental cooperation, and additional workload for teachers. Despite these issues, the respondents generally perceived the program as well-implemented, with grand mean scores of 4.30 (teachers) and 4.24 (parents). These results imply that although SBFP improves health, academic success needs a multi-faceted approach involving home, school, and community support systems. The study recommends strengthening parental involvement, ensuring timely funding, and building strong partnerships for health and nutrition among stakeholders.