Sediment and runoff losses from rainfall simulation: Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and tillage practice

There is a lack of information regarding how rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration will affect runoff aspects in cropping systems. Following a 10-year study, a rainfall simulation examined the impacts of atmospheric CO 2 level (ambient and twice ambient) and tillage system (conventional tillage and no-till) on a Decatur silt loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). Conventional tillage was a sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation using spring tillage and winter fallow, while the no-till system used this same rotation with three rotated cover crops [crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)]. Elevated atmospheric CO 2 led to more residue production in both tillage systems; this effect was greater under no-till conditions. More residue improved water infiltration only in the no-till system. Regardless of CO 2 level, sediment loss was lower under no-till, and elevated CO 2 reduced sediment loss in the conventional tillage system. No-till reduced sediment loss in addition to C, N, and P lost in sediment. No-till also reduced runoff water volume and N and P losses in this runoff. Results indicated that both high CO 2 and no-till management increased surface residues that could improve water infiltration, reduce sediment and runoff losses as well as nutrients lost in sediment and runoff water. This study suggests that farmers who practice conservation agriculture are likely to lose less soil and nutrients to rain-induced erosion and that these improvements could be enhanced as the CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere continues to rise. • Elevated CO 2 and no-till management increased crop residues and water infiltration. • Elevated CO 2 decreased total sediment loss, sediment N loss, and N loss in runoff. • No-till decreased runoff and soil loss and nutrients in both runoff water and soil. • These beneficial effects will improve soil health. • This pioneering work shows combined benefits of elevated CO 2 and no-till practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106799
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sediment and runoff losses from rainfall simulation: Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and tillage practice

Henry Allen Torbert, Dexter B. Watts, Stephen A. Prior, G. Brett Runion et al.
2 citations
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.91
article

Sediment and runoff losses from rainfall simulation: Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and tillage practice

Henry Allen Torbert, Dexter B. Watts, Stephen A. Prior, G. Brett Runion, Francisco J. Arriaga
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There is a lack of information regarding how rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration will affect runoff aspects in cropping systems. Following a 10-year study, a rainfall simulation examined the impacts of atmospheric CO 2 level (ambient and twice ambient) and tillage system (conventional tillage and no-till) on a Decatur silt loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults). Conventional tillage was a sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation using spring tillage and winter fallow, while the no-till system used this same rotation with three rotated cover crops [crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), sunn hemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.), and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)]. Elevated atmospheric CO 2 led to more residue production in both tillage systems; this effect was greater under no-till conditions. More residue improved water infiltration only in the no-till system. Regardless of CO 2 level, sediment loss was lower under no-till, and elevated CO 2 reduced sediment loss in the conventional tillage system. No-till reduced sediment loss in addition to C, N, and P lost in sediment. No-till also reduced runoff water volume and N and P losses in this runoff. Results indicated that both high CO 2 and no-till management increased surface residues that could improve water infiltration, reduce sediment and runoff losses as well as nutrients lost in sediment and runoff water. This study suggests that farmers who practice conservation agriculture are likely to lose less soil and nutrients to rain-induced erosion and that these improvements could be enhanced as the CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere continues to rise. • Elevated CO 2 and no-till management increased crop residues and water infiltration. • Elevated CO 2 decreased total sediment loss, sediment N loss, and N loss in runoff. • No-till decreased runoff and soil loss and nutrients in both runoff water and soil. • These beneficial effects will improve soil health. • This pioneering work shows combined benefits of elevated CO 2 and no-till practices.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 255
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), National Soil Dynamics Research Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.