Switching Perspectives: Enhancing Generative Artificial Intelligence's Creativity, by Humans, With Design

ABSTRACT Over the past few years, with the advent of ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been at the centre of numerous discussions regarding generative and creative power, especially with the hope that it will enhance human creativity and, consequently, transformative power. Creativity, especially human creativity, has long been studied, particularly by psychologists and design scientists, who have revealed the difficulty of overcoming the fixation effect. This effect can hinder creativity and has not yet been explored in relation to GenAI, even though it is of major importance for understanding creative issues. In this work, we propose leveraging the rich body of literature on design creativity and creativity management to shed light on the fixation effect related to GenAI tools, which are considered partners in the design process, and possible defixation techniques. To study this issue, we propose a twofold methodology: a first, in‐depth qualitative step with design theory experts, leading to the formulation of hypotheses, and a second, experimental step based on the well‐documented egg task in creativity to test the hypotheses. Ultimately, we show that the use of GenAI tools in creative endeavours results in a greater number of generated ideas and that it does not prevent the fixation effect but can foster idea exploration and thus help with second‐order defixation. These results consequently show the importance of considering a cocreativity regime involving both humans and GenAI, and they extend knowledge on the fixation effect in this context. They also indicate the capacity of GenAI in creative processes, thus suggesting some relevant use cases to leverage these tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Creativity and Innovation Management
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.70013
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Switching Perspectives: Enhancing Generative Artificial Intelligence's Creativity, by Humans, With Design

Antoine Bordas, Pascal Le Masson, Benoît Weil
3 citations
Creativity and Innovation Management
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
6.35
article

Switching Perspectives: Enhancing Generative Artificial Intelligence's Creativity, by Humans, With Design

Antoine Bordas, Pascal Le Masson, Benoît Weil
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past few years, with the advent of ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been at the centre of numerous discussions regarding generative and creative power, especially with the hope that it will enhance human creativity and, consequently, transformative power. Creativity, especially human creativity, has long been studied, particularly by psychologists and design scientists, who have revealed the difficulty of overcoming the fixation effect. This effect can hinder creativity and has not yet been explored in relation to GenAI, even though it is of major importance for understanding creative issues. In this work, we propose leveraging the rich body of literature on design creativity and creativity management to shed light on the fixation effect related to GenAI tools, which are considered partners in the design process, and possible defixation techniques. To study this issue, we propose a twofold methodology: a first, in‐depth qualitative step with design theory experts, leading to the formulation of hypotheses, and a second, experimental step based on the well‐documented egg task in creativity to test the hypotheses. Ultimately, we show that the use of GenAI tools in creative endeavours results in a greater number of generated ideas and that it does not prevent the fixation effect but can foster idea exploration and thus help with second‐order defixation. These results consequently show the importance of considering a cocreativity regime involving both humans and GenAI, and they extend knowledge on the fixation effect in this context. They also indicate the capacity of GenAI in creative processes, thus suggesting some relevant use cases to leverage these tools.

Creativity and Innovation ManagementVol. 34(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Centre de Gestion Scientifique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
6.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.