Twenty-Five Years of Smart Growth: Perspectives from Urban and Rural Maryland

Maryland passed groundbreaking state planning legislation 25 years ago. The state’s renowned Smart Growth program applied uniformly to urban and rural jurisdictions across the state. This study presents results from a 2023 survey that explores perceptions of the program across the urban-rural divide in Maryland. Most all respondents believe smart growth has not achieved its goals but remains relevant in Maryland. Urban and rural respondents are divided, though, when it comes to support for revising the original goals to incorporate current priorities, particularly climate change and social equity. Overall, Maryland planners feel they have not made sufficient progress toward achieving the objectives of smart growth and recognize that more must be done on equity, climate change, and more. For planners from Maryland and elsewhere, these findings indicate that while state-level planning can be fruitful, it requires localized nuance and acknowledgement of differing priorities and needs between urban and rural communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x251353745
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty-Five Years of Smart Growth: Perspectives from Urban and Rural Maryland

Gerrit‐Jan Knaap, Rebecca S. Lewis, Eric Tjon Burnstein
State and Local Government Review
Rural development and sustainability
article

Twenty-Five Years of Smart Growth: Perspectives from Urban and Rural Maryland

Gerrit‐Jan Knaap, Rebecca S. Lewis, Eric Tjon Burnstein
article en

Abstract

Maryland passed groundbreaking state planning legislation 25 years ago. The state’s renowned Smart Growth program applied uniformly to urban and rural jurisdictions across the state. This study presents results from a 2023 survey that explores perceptions of the program across the urban-rural divide in Maryland. Most all respondents believe smart growth has not achieved its goals but remains relevant in Maryland. Urban and rural respondents are divided, though, when it comes to support for revising the original goals to incorporate current priorities, particularly climate change and social equity. Overall, Maryland planners feel they have not made sufficient progress toward achieving the objectives of smart growth and recognize that more must be done on equity, climate change, and more. For planners from Maryland and elsewhere, these findings indicate that while state-level planning can be fruitful, it requires localized nuance and acknowledgement of differing priorities and needs between urban and rural communities.

State and Local Government ReviewVol. 57(4)
University of Oregon (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Twenty-Five Years of Smart Growth: Perspectives from Urban and Rural Maryland — Gerrit‐Jan Knaap, Rebecca S. Lewis, et al. · State and Local Government Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS