Uncertainty, Doubt, and Faith: A Kierkegaardian Model of Authenticity

Abstract In this paper, I draw upon recent commentary on Kierkegaard’s existential religious philosophy in order to clarify some key aspects of the idea of authenticity. Interpretations of Kierkegaard’s work in this area highlight the importance of truth considered subjectively rather than objectively, while emphasising the critical role of faith in understanding the truth for an individual subject. However, there remains some dispute about the importance of the objective referent in subjective truth claims and affirmations of faith. Considering how objective uncertainty forms an integral part of faith for Kierkegaard, I argue against the importance of an objective referent for subjective truth, as relations of faith hold despite– and indeed, partly because of– their underlying objective uncertainty. The objective truth of one’s subjective truth claims is, in other words, not a necessary criterion for truth as subjectivity for Kierkegaard. From this, I draw a connection to the centrality of genuine doubt in the pragmatist philosophy of Charles Peirce, in order to construct and defend a model of authenticity that emphasises a receptiveness to genuine doubt at its core.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sophia
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-025-01080-y
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty, Doubt, and Faith: A Kierkegaardian Model of Authenticity

Arden Rushwood
Sophia
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Uncertainty, Doubt, and Faith: A Kierkegaardian Model of Authenticity

Arden Rushwood
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I draw upon recent commentary on Kierkegaard’s existential religious philosophy in order to clarify some key aspects of the idea of authenticity. Interpretations of Kierkegaard’s work in this area highlight the importance of truth considered subjectively rather than objectively, while emphasising the critical role of faith in understanding the truth for an individual subject. However, there remains some dispute about the importance of the objective referent in subjective truth claims and affirmations of faith. Considering how objective uncertainty forms an integral part of faith for Kierkegaard, I argue against the importance of an objective referent for subjective truth, as relations of faith hold despite– and indeed, partly because of– their underlying objective uncertainty. The objective truth of one’s subjective truth claims is, in other words, not a necessary criterion for truth as subjectivity for Kierkegaard. From this, I draw a connection to the centrality of genuine doubt in the pragmatist philosophy of Charles Peirce, in order to construct and defend a model of authenticity that emphasises a receptiveness to genuine doubt at its core.

SophiaVol. 64(4)
The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncertainty, Doubt, and Faith: A Kierkegaardian Model of Authenticity — Arden Rushwood · Sophia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS