Generative bias: widespread, unexpected, and uninterpretable biases in generative models and their implications

Generative models, with their ability to create new data, have significantly advanced machine learning. However, these models can also produce biased outputs, threatening representational fairness. Current literature mainly addresses biases in synthetic data that amplify social biases, such as racial and gender stereotypes, alongside underrepresentation and misrepresentation. In this paper, we argue for the existence of previously unexplored biases that generative models can produce on a massive scale. Using Generative Adversarial Networks as a case study, we show that these unexpected and hard to interpret biases can systematically marginalize and denigrate minoritized communities. Importantly, these biases are not merely a reflection of human biases in the training data but a consequence of machine learning processes that diverge from the human perspective. We contend that current debiasing strategies are inadequate, as they fail to fully grasp the epistemic challenges and underestimate the moral risks of generative models. We conclude by suggesting a novel direction to ameliorate their harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02533-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative bias: widespread, unexpected, and uninterpretable biases in generative models and their implications

Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Tsung-Ren Huang
4 citations
AI & Society
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
16.81
article

Generative bias: widespread, unexpected, and uninterpretable biases in generative models and their implications

Linus Ta-Lun Huang, Tsung-Ren Huang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Generative models, with their ability to create new data, have significantly advanced machine learning. However, these models can also produce biased outputs, threatening representational fairness. Current literature mainly addresses biases in synthetic data that amplify social biases, such as racial and gender stereotypes, alongside underrepresentation and misrepresentation. In this paper, we argue for the existence of previously unexplored biases that generative models can produce on a massive scale. Using Generative Adversarial Networks as a case study, we show that these unexpected and hard to interpret biases can systematically marginalize and denigrate minoritized communities. Importantly, these biases are not merely a reflection of human biases in the training data but a consequence of machine learning processes that diverge from the human perspective. We contend that current debiasing strategies are inadequate, as they fail to fully grasp the epistemic challenges and underestimate the moral risks of generative models. We conclude by suggesting a novel direction to ameliorate their harm.

AI & Society
National Taiwan University (TW), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.