Evaluating a New Optical Device for Velocity-Based Training: Validity and Reliability of the PowerTrackTM Sensor

Background: Velocity-based training (VBT) requires precise measurement devices to monitor neuromuscular performance. PowerTrackTM is a novel optoelectronic device designed to assess movement velocity in resistance training. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PowerTrackTM during the Smith machine back squat. Methods: Twenty experienced-trained men performed three repetitions at three submaximal loads (20, 50, and 70 kg) across two sessions. Velocity metrics—mean velocity (MV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and maximum velocity (Vmax)—were simultaneously recorded by PowerTrackTM and the criterion device (MuscleLabTM). Validity was assessed via ordinary least products (OLP) regression, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland–Altman plots. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and minimum detectable change (MDC). Results: PowerTrack showed high agreement with MuscleLabTM for MPV and Vmax (slope ≈ 1.00; CCC = 0.95–0.97), while MV presented a proportional bias (slope = 0.83). ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.91 across loads, and SEM remained <0.09 m/s for all metrics, indicating excellent relative reliability and acceptable absolute precision. Conclusion: Despite a slight underestimation of MV at light loads, PowerTrackTM proved to be a valid and reliable device for velocity monitoring in VBT contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrology
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology5030049
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating a New Optical Device for Velocity-Based Training: Validity and Reliability of the PowerTrackTM Sensor

Darío Rodrigo-Mallorca, Ángel Saez-Berlanga, Fernando Martín, Iván Chulvi‐Medrano et al.
2 citations
Metrology
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Evaluating a New Optical Device for Velocity-Based Training: Validity and Reliability of the PowerTrackTM Sensor

Darío Rodrigo-Mallorca, Ángel Saez-Berlanga, Fernando Martín, Iván Chulvi‐Medrano, Luis M. Franco-Grau, Jose Vidal-Vidal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Velocity-based training (VBT) requires precise measurement devices to monitor neuromuscular performance. PowerTrackTM is a novel optoelectronic device designed to assess movement velocity in resistance training. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PowerTrackTM during the Smith machine back squat. Methods: Twenty experienced-trained men performed three repetitions at three submaximal loads (20, 50, and 70 kg) across two sessions. Velocity metrics—mean velocity (MV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and maximum velocity (Vmax)—were simultaneously recorded by PowerTrackTM and the criterion device (MuscleLabTM). Validity was assessed via ordinary least products (OLP) regression, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland–Altman plots. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and minimum detectable change (MDC). Results: PowerTrack showed high agreement with MuscleLabTM for MPV and Vmax (slope ≈ 1.00; CCC = 0.95–0.97), while MV presented a proportional bias (slope = 0.83). ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.91 across loads, and SEM remained <0.09 m/s for all metrics, indicating excellent relative reliability and acceptable absolute precision. Conclusion: Despite a slight underestimation of MV at light loads, PowerTrackTM proved to be a valid and reliable device for velocity monitoring in VBT contexts.

MetrologyVol. 5(3)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universitat de València (ES)
Generalitat Valenciana
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.