A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Individual- and Fire Department-Level Factors Affecting Volunteer Firefighter Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Volunteer firefighters often have lower cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and less access to health monitoring and fitness programs than career firefighters, yet few studies explore how individual and departmental factors influence their CRF. This study assessed associations between CRF and both firefighter-level (e.g., years of service, firefighting calls, and firefighter rank) and department-level (e.g., department characteristics and fitness infrastructure) factors among volunteer firefighters. Surveys were administered to United States volunteer firefighters and departments, capturing CRF and related characteristics. CRF was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable (≤8, >8-<10, 10-<12, ≥12 METs) using bivariate analyses and mixed effects linear and logistic regression. Among 569 incumbent volunteer firefighters from 41 departments, 79.9% did not meet the recommended 12 METs threshold. Only 56.8% of departments provided routine physical exams; 35.1% had a wellness coordinator or committee; and 40.5% offered fitness resources. More years of service were associated with lower CRF and reduced odds of meeting the 12 METs benchmark, while more frequent training and responding to more calls were associated with better CRF. These findings highlight individual and structural challenges for CRF in volunteer fire service, underscoring the need for targeted fitness support to protect firefighter health and community safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8080319
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Individual- and Fire Department-Level Factors Affecting Volunteer Firefighter Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Derrick L. Edwards, Nimit N. Shah, Kaleigh M. Hinton, Alberto J. Caban‐Martinez et al.
Fire
Occupational Health and Performance
article

A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Individual- and Fire Department-Level Factors Affecting Volunteer Firefighter Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Derrick L. Edwards, Nimit N. Shah, Kaleigh M. Hinton, Alberto J. Caban‐Martinez, Brittany S. Hollerbach, Taylor M. Black, Brian S. Kubiel, Cristine D. Delnevo, Judith M. Graber, Sara A. Jahnke, Olivia A. Wackowski, Jason Roy
article en

Abstract

Volunteer firefighters often have lower cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and less access to health monitoring and fitness programs than career firefighters, yet few studies explore how individual and departmental factors influence their CRF. This study assessed associations between CRF and both firefighter-level (e.g., years of service, firefighting calls, and firefighter rank) and department-level (e.g., department characteristics and fitness infrastructure) factors among volunteer firefighters. Surveys were administered to United States volunteer firefighters and departments, capturing CRF and related characteristics. CRF was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable (≤8, >8-<10, 10-<12, ≥12 METs) using bivariate analyses and mixed effects linear and logistic regression. Among 569 incumbent volunteer firefighters from 41 departments, 79.9% did not meet the recommended 12 METs threshold. Only 56.8% of departments provided routine physical exams; 35.1% had a wellness coordinator or committee; and 40.5% offered fitness resources. More years of service were associated with lower CRF and reduced odds of meeting the 12 METs benchmark, while more frequent training and responding to more calls were associated with better CRF. These findings highlight individual and structural challenges for CRF in volunteer fire service, underscoring the need for targeted fitness support to protect firefighter health and community safety.

FireVol. 8(8)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Miami (US), Advanced Memory Research Institute of New Jersey (US), Tennessee Technological University (US)
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, National Institutes of Health, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.