Empirical Evaluation of Various Metaheuristics for Efficient Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Bioinformatics Data

The analysis of gene expression data in the field of bioinformatics holds critical importance for enhancing the understanding of genetic and molecular biological processes, supporting the early diagnosis of diseases, and developing therapeutic strategies. However, due to the typically high-dimensional and complex structure of these data, the analysis process can be challenging. In this study, the effectiveness of feature selection methods was investigated with the aim of improving the classification performance of high-dimensional gene expression data. To this end, a wrapper approach was developed to enhance classification accuracy through feature selection. In the first stage of the study, an unlabeled dataset was divided into two classes using the K-Means clustering method, thereby obtaining the necessary label information for classification. Subsequently, feature selection was performed using three metaheuristics, namely Simulated Annealing (SA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). The accuracy of each algorithm was evaluated using four different machine learning classifiers-Support Vector Classification (SVC), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree Classifier (DTC)-through $\mathbf{1 0}$-fold cross-validation. This process was carried out on subsets of varying sizes consisting of $5,10,15,20,50$, and 100 features, and execution times were also recorded. The findings demonstrated that the SA offered an ideal option with fast execution times and acceptable accuracy levels, while the GA provided a balance between accuracy and execution time, making it suitable for optimization purposes. On the other hand, although the ACO achieved high accuracy rates, it was characterized by longer execution times. In summary, this study emphasizes that the selection of the appropriate metaheuristic should be made according to application requirements and provides a detailed framework for examining the performance of three metaheuristics in bioinformatics analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isas66241.2025.11101825
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Evaluation of Various Metaheuristics for Efficient Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Bioinformatics Data

Deniz Dal, Esra Çelik, Seda Erden Dertli
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Empirical Evaluation of Various Metaheuristics for Efficient Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Bioinformatics Data

Deniz Dal, Esra Çelik, Seda Erden Dertli
article en

Abstract

The analysis of gene expression data in the field of bioinformatics holds critical importance for enhancing the understanding of genetic and molecular biological processes, supporting the early diagnosis of diseases, and developing therapeutic strategies. However, due to the typically high-dimensional and complex structure of these data, the analysis process can be challenging. In this study, the effectiveness of feature selection methods was investigated with the aim of improving the classification performance of high-dimensional gene expression data. To this end, a wrapper approach was developed to enhance classification accuracy through feature selection. In the first stage of the study, an unlabeled dataset was divided into two classes using the K-Means clustering method, thereby obtaining the necessary label information for classification. Subsequently, feature selection was performed using three metaheuristics, namely Simulated Annealing (SA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). The accuracy of each algorithm was evaluated using four different machine learning classifiers-Support Vector Classification (SVC), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree Classifier (DTC)-through $\mathbf{1 0}$-fold cross-validation. This process was carried out on subsets of varying sizes consisting of $5,10,15,20,50$, and 100 features, and execution times were also recorded. The findings demonstrated that the SA offered an ideal option with fast execution times and acceptable accuracy levels, while the GA provided a balance between accuracy and execution time, making it suitable for optimization purposes. On the other hand, although the ACO achieved high accuracy rates, it was characterized by longer execution times. In summary, this study emphasizes that the selection of the appropriate metaheuristic should be made according to application requirements and provides a detailed framework for examining the performance of three metaheuristics in bioinformatics analyses.

Atatürk University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empirical Evaluation of Various Metaheuristics for Efficient Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Bioinformatics Data — Deniz Dal, Esra Çelik, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS