A Decision-Making Method for Photon/Proton Selection for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Based on Dose Prediction and NTCP

<b>Introduction</b>: Decision-making regarding radiotherapy techniques for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer requires a comparison of photon and proton plans generated using planning software, which requires time and expertise. We developed a fully automated decision tool to select patients for proton therapy that predicts proton therapy (XT) and photon therapy (PT) dose distributions using only patient CT image data, predicts xerostomia and dysphagia probability using predicted critical organ mean doses, and makes decisions based on the Netherlands' National Indication Protocol Proton therapy (NIPP) to select patients likely to benefit from proton therapy. <b>Methods</b>: This study used 48 nasopharyngeal patients treated at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We manually generated a photon plan and a proton plan for each patient. Based on this dose distribution, photon and proton dose prediction models were trained using deep learning (DL) models. We used the NIPP model to measure xerostomia levels 2 and 3, dysphagia levels 2 and 3, and decisions were made according to the thresholds given by this protocol. <b>Results</b>: The predicted doses for both photon and proton groups were comparable to those for manual plan (MP). The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for each organ at risk in the photon and proton plans did not exceed 5% and showed a good performance of the dose prediction model. For proton, the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of xerostomia and dysphagia performed well, <i>p</i> > 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference. For photon, the NTCP of dysphagia performed well, <i>p</i> > 0.05. For xerostomia <i>p</i> < 0.05 but the absolute deviation was 0.85% and 0.75%, which would not have a great impact on the prediction result. Among the 48 patients' decisions, 3 were wrong, and the correct rate was 93.8%. The area under curve (AUC) of operating characteristic curve (ROC) was 0.86, showing the good performance of the decision-making tool in this study. <b>Conclusions</b>: The decision tool based on DL and NTCP models can accurately select nasopharyngeal cancer patients who will benefit from proton therapy. The time spent generating comparison plans is reduced and the diagnostic efficiency of doctors is improved, and the tool can be shared with centers that do not have proton expertise. <b>Trial registration</b>: This study was a retrospective study, so it was exempt from registration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162620
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Decision-Making Method for Photon/Proton Selection for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Based on Dose Prediction and NTCP

Jianrong Dai, Junlin Yi, Guiyuan Li, Jialin Ding et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
article

A Decision-Making Method for Photon/Proton Selection for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Based on Dose Prediction and NTCP

Jianrong Dai, Junlin Yi, Guiyuan Li, Jialin Ding, Linyi Shen, Mengyang Li, Xinyuan Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Decision-making regarding radiotherapy techniques for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer requires a comparison of photon and proton plans generated using planning software, which requires time and expertise. We developed a fully automated decision tool to select patients for proton therapy that predicts proton therapy (XT) and photon therapy (PT) dose distributions using only patient CT image data, predicts xerostomia and dysphagia probability using predicted critical organ mean doses, and makes decisions based on the Netherlands' National Indication Protocol Proton therapy (NIPP) to select patients likely to benefit from proton therapy. <b>Methods</b>: This study used 48 nasopharyngeal patients treated at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We manually generated a photon plan and a proton plan for each patient. Based on this dose distribution, photon and proton dose prediction models were trained using deep learning (DL) models. We used the NIPP model to measure xerostomia levels 2 and 3, dysphagia levels 2 and 3, and decisions were made according to the thresholds given by this protocol. <b>Results</b>: The predicted doses for both photon and proton groups were comparable to those for manual plan (MP). The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for each organ at risk in the photon and proton plans did not exceed 5% and showed a good performance of the dose prediction model. For proton, the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of xerostomia and dysphagia performed well, <i>p</i> > 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference. For photon, the NTCP of dysphagia performed well, <i>p</i> > 0.05. For xerostomia <i>p</i> < 0.05 but the absolute deviation was 0.85% and 0.75%, which would not have a great impact on the prediction result. Among the 48 patients' decisions, 3 were wrong, and the correct rate was 93.8%. The area under curve (AUC) of operating characteristic curve (ROC) was 0.86, showing the good performance of the decision-making tool in this study. <b>Conclusions</b>: The decision tool based on DL and NTCP models can accurately select nasopharyngeal cancer patients who will benefit from proton therapy. The time spent generating comparison plans is reduced and the diagnostic efficiency of doctors is improved, and the tool can be shared with centers that do not have proton expertise. <b>Trial registration</b>: This study was a retrospective study, so it was exempt from registration.

CancersVol. 17(16)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.