Portable X-ray fluorescence as a tool for urban soil contamination analysis: accuracy, precision, and practicality

Abstract. Urban agriculture has become an essential component of urban sustainability, but it often faces the challenge of soil contamination with heavy metal(loid)s like lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn). Traditional laboratory methods for detecting these contaminants, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy and other inductively coupled plasma techniques, are accurate but can be costly and time-consuming and require extensive sample preparation. Portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) presents a promising alternative, offering rapid, in situ analysis with minimal sample preparation. The study reviews literature on PXRF analyzers to determine their accuracy and precision in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils, with the goal of optimizing sampling, reducing laboratory costs and time, and identifying priority metal contamination hotspots. A literature review was conducted using Web of Science and Google Scholar, focusing on studies that validated PXRF measurements with alternate laboratory methods or certified reference materials (CRMs). This study reviews 84 publications to evaluate the accuracy and precision of PXRF in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils. The review covers instrument types, action methods, testing conditions, and sample preparation techniques. Results show that, when properly calibrated, particularly with CRMs, PXRF can achieve reliable accuracy. Ex situ measurements tend to be more precise due to controlled conditions, although in situ measurements offer practical advantages in urban settings. Portable XRF emerges as a viable method for assessing urban soil contamination by balancing accuracy and practicality. Future research should focus on optimizing sample preparation and calibration to further enhance PXRF reliability in urban environments, ultimately strengthening PXRF methodologies and supporting extension efforts through improved, accessible soil-testing tools, facilitating healthier urban soils, safer urban food production, and enhanced community well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOIL
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-565-2025
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portable X-ray fluorescence as a tool for urban soil contamination analysis: accuracy, precision, and practicality

Anna Paltseva, E.N. Jenkins, John M. Galbraith
3 citations
SOIL
Heavy metals in environment
1.51
article

Portable X-ray fluorescence as a tool for urban soil contamination analysis: accuracy, precision, and practicality

Anna Paltseva, E.N. Jenkins, John M. Galbraith
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Urban agriculture has become an essential component of urban sustainability, but it often faces the challenge of soil contamination with heavy metal(loid)s like lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn). Traditional laboratory methods for detecting these contaminants, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy and other inductively coupled plasma techniques, are accurate but can be costly and time-consuming and require extensive sample preparation. Portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) presents a promising alternative, offering rapid, in situ analysis with minimal sample preparation. The study reviews literature on PXRF analyzers to determine their accuracy and precision in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils, with the goal of optimizing sampling, reducing laboratory costs and time, and identifying priority metal contamination hotspots. A literature review was conducted using Web of Science and Google Scholar, focusing on studies that validated PXRF measurements with alternate laboratory methods or certified reference materials (CRMs). This study reviews 84 publications to evaluate the accuracy and precision of PXRF in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils. The review covers instrument types, action methods, testing conditions, and sample preparation techniques. Results show that, when properly calibrated, particularly with CRMs, PXRF can achieve reliable accuracy. Ex situ measurements tend to be more precise due to controlled conditions, although in situ measurements offer practical advantages in urban settings. Portable XRF emerges as a viable method for assessing urban soil contamination by balancing accuracy and practicality. Future research should focus on optimizing sample preparation and calibration to further enhance PXRF reliability in urban environments, ultimately strengthening PXRF methodologies and supporting extension efforts through improved, accessible soil-testing tools, facilitating healthier urban soils, safer urban food production, and enhanced community well-being.

SOILVol. 11(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Heavy metals in environment
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.