Supply-demand coordination and driving forces of soil conservation services in the middle and lower Jinsha River Basin, China

• A supply–demand–coordination–driving integrated framework for SCS was developed. • SCS supply increased by 11.8%, and demand decreased by 26.6% during from 2000 to 2020. • The threshold for achieving coordination has gradually declined, reflecting improved system resilience. • Zoning-based strategies were proposed for upstream protection, midstream regulation, and downstream optimization. The dynamic coordination of ecosystem service supply and demand is a critical pathway for achieving regional ecological governance and optimized resource allocation. This study focuses on the middle and lower Jinsha River Basin (MLJR) and develops an integrated analytical framework encompassing “supply-demand-coordination-drivers.” The RUSLE model was used to estimate the spatiotemporal patterns of soil conservation service (SCS) supply and demand from 2000 to 2020. The ecological supply–demand ratio (ESDR) and coupling coordination degree (CCD) were integrated to quantitatively assess the system’s coordination status. Additionally, machine learning algorithms and the multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) were introduced to identify spatial heterogeneity and key driving factors. The results show that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the supply of SCS in the study area increased, while demand decreased. The ESDR rose from 0.13 to 0.19, indicating enhanced system service capacity. The regional coordination level exhibited a gradient pattern of “upstream imbalance – midstream transition – downstream coordination.” (2) During this period, the CCD increased from 0.25 to 0.28. Strengthened supply and reduced demand jointly improved coordination levels, and the threshold for achieving coordination gradually decreased over time. (3) Topography, vegetation, and soil conservation measures were the main driving factors, exhibiting significant nonlinear responses and spatial heterogeneity with respect to the ESDR. Human activities in the study area had a significant negative impact on supply–demand coordination, acting as a major disturbance to the system. This study constructs a multi-factor, multi-scale driver identification system, providing theoretical support for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of ecosystem services in typical mountainous regions and differentiated governance strategies. It also offers methodological references for optimizing watershed-scale soil conservation engineering and refined ecological spatial management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114029
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supply-demand coordination and driving forces of soil conservation services in the middle and lower Jinsha River Basin, China

Shi Qi, Jinlin Lai
3 citations
Ecological Indicators
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
article

Supply-demand coordination and driving forces of soil conservation services in the middle and lower Jinsha River Basin, China

Shi Qi, Jinlin Lai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• A supply–demand–coordination–driving integrated framework for SCS was developed. • SCS supply increased by 11.8%, and demand decreased by 26.6% during from 2000 to 2020. • The threshold for achieving coordination has gradually declined, reflecting improved system resilience. • Zoning-based strategies were proposed for upstream protection, midstream regulation, and downstream optimization. The dynamic coordination of ecosystem service supply and demand is a critical pathway for achieving regional ecological governance and optimized resource allocation. This study focuses on the middle and lower Jinsha River Basin (MLJR) and develops an integrated analytical framework encompassing “supply-demand-coordination-drivers.” The RUSLE model was used to estimate the spatiotemporal patterns of soil conservation service (SCS) supply and demand from 2000 to 2020. The ecological supply–demand ratio (ESDR) and coupling coordination degree (CCD) were integrated to quantitatively assess the system’s coordination status. Additionally, machine learning algorithms and the multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) were introduced to identify spatial heterogeneity and key driving factors. The results show that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the supply of SCS in the study area increased, while demand decreased. The ESDR rose from 0.13 to 0.19, indicating enhanced system service capacity. The regional coordination level exhibited a gradient pattern of “upstream imbalance – midstream transition – downstream coordination.” (2) During this period, the CCD increased from 0.25 to 0.28. Strengthened supply and reduced demand jointly improved coordination levels, and the threshold for achieving coordination gradually decreased over time. (3) Topography, vegetation, and soil conservation measures were the main driving factors, exhibiting significant nonlinear responses and spatial heterogeneity with respect to the ESDR. Human activities in the study area had a significant negative impact on supply–demand coordination, acting as a major disturbance to the system. This study constructs a multi-factor, multi-scale driver identification system, providing theoretical support for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of ecosystem services in typical mountainous regions and differentiated governance strategies. It also offers methodological references for optimizing watershed-scale soil conservation engineering and refined ecological spatial management.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 178
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.